Closed PunchesMalone closed 10 months ago
Thanks for submitting this potential issue. Is it possible for you to provide a sample code for reproduction?
Sure, give me a bit to put together some minimum working code.
David
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:24 Bharat Mahajan @.***> wrote:
Thanks for submitting this potential issue. Is it possible for you to provide a sample code for reproduction?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/princemahajan/FLINT/issues/14#issuecomment-1320063199, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIGSICMPTFVDKHIT7UE272LWI6GSVANCNFSM6AAAAAASEQKN3Q . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
--
Hello,
Here's a minimum working example, you can just unzip and compile with the current version of FLINT linked. . . The .py file will make a plot for you.
David
thanks for submitting your code. Will look into it.
This issue is fixed. A relatively recent unnecessary code change I did, messed up the interpolation coefficient computation. See the latest WP test codes.
Hello,
Thanks for writing this package. When attempting to use the DOP853 integrator in dense mode to integrate a Gateway reference orbit in the CR3BP, the dense output does not achieve accuracy better than approx 1.e-6 in terms of the Jacobi constant variation, no matter how high I set the rtol/atol values. When comparing against the SciPy DOP853 implementation, the performance is markedly better, with Jacobi Constant error roughly tracking the rtol setting (see attached figure). I attempted to find the bug myself but I was unsuccessful.