Closed davidmcomfort closed 1 year ago
Interesting! I would encourage you to try out 50 or 100 samples before concluding thought --- naive prompting can also solve some instances effortlessly.
Will do.
I also came up another algorithm, "Serendipitous Divergence Algorithm," which solved Game of 24 in two iterations:
Step 1. Problem Definition:
- Prompt: "Define the problem that needs to be solved."
Step 2. Diverse Idea Generation:
- Prompt: "Generate a range of diverse and innovative solutions to the problem."
Step 3. Serendipity Injection:
- Prompt: "Explore unconventional aspects of the problem and propose wild or counterintuitive approaches."
Step 4. Idea Selection:
- Prompt: "From the generated solutions, select the most promising or intriguing ones, even if they appear unconventional."
Step 5. Idea Refinement:
- Prompt: "Refine the selected ideas to increase their feasibility and effectiveness."
Step 6. Iterative Divergence:
- Prompt: "Based on the refined ideas, identify further unexpected pathways. Explore these new avenues."
Step 7. Evaluation and Iteration:
- Prompt: "Evaluate the newly developed ideas and refine them. Continue to iterate this process until a robust solution or set of solutions is developed."
And the result:
Sure, let's repeat the Serendipitous Divergence Algorithm with a different set of numbers for the Game of 24. We'll use 1, 3, 4, and 6.
Problem Definition:
- Our task is to use the numbers 1, 3, 4, and 6 each once and apply addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division to arrive at the target number of 24.
Diverse Idea Generation:
- Prompt: Generate several combinations of these numbers using mathematical operations.
- Response: Here are some combinations:
- (1 + 3) * (4 + 6)
- 3 * (6 - (4 - 1))
- 6 * (4 - (1 / 3))
- 1 (3 + (4 6))
Serendipity Injection:
- Prompt: Let's think outside the box. Can we consider unconventional operations or sequences?
- Response: We can consider playing around with the operation precedence, by adding brackets at non-traditional places. For example:
- ((1 - 6) * 4) / 3
Idea Selection:
- Prompt: Which of these combinations look promising, even if they seem unconventional?
- Response: The following combinations seem promising:
- 3 * (6 - (4 - 1))
- 6 * (4 - (1 / 3))
- ((1 - 6) * 4) / 3
Idea Refinement:
- Prompt: Can we refine these solutions to make them more effective?
- Response: We can try adjusting the sequence of operations or repositioning the brackets:
- (3 * 6) - (4 - 1)
- (6 * 4) - (1 / 3)
- ((6 - 1) * 4) / 3
Iterative Divergence:
- Prompt: Based on the refined ideas, are there other new pathways we can explore?
- Response: We could try mixing the operations in a different order:
- (3 * (6 - 4)) - 1
- (4 * (6 - 1)) / 3
- (6 - (1 / 3)) * 4
Evaluation and Iteration:
- Prompt: Evaluate these new combinations and refine them if needed.
- Response: Let's calculate each one:
- (3 * (6 - 4)) - 1 = 5
- (4 * (6 - 1)) / 3 = 6.6667
- (6 - (1 / 3)) * 4 = 22
- None of these new combinations result in 24, so we need to continue the iteration process.
Again, we would continue to iterate this process until we find a solution or exhaust our options.
[USER]: Iterate again until you are sure you solved the problem
Let's continue iterating the Serendipitous Divergence Algorithm steps.
Idea Selection (continued):
- Prompt: Select the most promising or unconventional idea from the previous round.
- Response: The expression (6 - (1 / 3)) * 4 seems most promising as it resulted in 22, which is closer to 24.
Idea Refinement (continued):
- Prompt: Refine this selected idea.
- Response: To refine this, we can adjust the position of the numbers and operations: (6 / (1 - (3 / 4)))
Iterative Divergence (continued):
- Prompt: Based on the refined idea, are there any other unexpected pathways to explore?
- Response: By changing the positions of the numbers and operation signs, we can create the following expression: (6 / (1 - (3 / 4)))
Evaluation and Iteration (continued):
- Prompt: Evaluate this new combination and refine it if needed.
- Response: Calculating the new expression:
- (6 / (1 - (3 / 4))) = 24
- The new combination results in 24, so we've found a solution to the problem.
We have used the numbers 1, 3, 4, and 6 each once with the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division to arrive at the target number of 24, following the rules of the Game of 24. Therefore, the solution to the problem is (6 / (1 - (3 / 4))) = 24.
I will test this out more.
interesting! stay tuned
@davidmcomfort will close for now since it's not a code issue, but happy to catch up via email if you have progress.
I asked GPT-4 to describe an algorithm to solve the Game of 24 and then used that algorithm to solve a certain set-up and it seemed to solve it on the first attempt:
And GPT-4's response: