Closed zhihao-lin closed 5 days ago
Hello! The sole issue here (I believe) is the lack of motion blur. We turn this off by default for efficiency and because the ground truth always reflects the non blurred version. You can re-enable it adding 'configure_blender.motion_blur=True' to your --overrides.
Thanks for the question and providing the reference images, lmk if this does not fix.
Thanks for the prompt response!
The generated rainy images look more realistic by adding configure_blender.motion_blur=True
after the --overrides, as shown in the first image below.
One thing I found interesting is that the ground truth also reflects the motion blur, which could be seen in the depth (second image) and normal (third image).
Another thing about the rain simulation is that after applying motion blur, the generation takes much longer time (more than 5.5 hours). I am not sure if this is expected and am wondering if there's any tricks to accelerate.
Describe the bug
Hi @araistrick, thank you for the excellent work, and the demo video looks fantastic! Currently, I am trying to reproduce the weather effects (e.g. rain, snow) that are demonstrated in the video 1:05, 2:07, but unfortunately, the results I generated are not as good as expected. As a result, I have some questions regarding this issue:
rain_settings()
in infinigen/core/placement/particles.py) in these demo videos?Steps to Reproduce
What command did you run?
I generate the rainy video with the following script:
and the generated frames are provided below: https://github.com/princeton-vl/infinigen/assets/39002023/09fbee13-93dc-4a82-b665-03d07376df83 where the dynamic of rain is not temporally continuous and each frame doesn't look like it's rainy.
Platform
Thanks for your help!