Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
What is your proposed format? Why is it better?
Changing the logging formatter is probably all that's required for this, but
since it's a style preference you're never going to please everyone.
Original comment by tfmorris
on 16 Nov 2010 at 5:46
Original comment by tfmorris
on 16 Nov 2010 at 6:05
The whitespace is necessary to provide enough information to show packages when
log4j channels are actually java classes (which is most the time). This is
trivial to change by using a different log formatter in the log4j.properties
configuration file. The log formatter we're using is able to handle
sophisticated uses of logs (for example > indents and < outdents at the
beginning of log strings) but since it's very simple to change to use a more
standard log4j formatter, I'm closing this one as a won't fix.
Original comment by stefa...@google.com
on 24 Dec 2010 at 9:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mcnamara.tim@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2010 at 12:58