Closed kittybest closed 1 month ago
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
---|---|---|---|---|
maci-rpgf | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | May 24, 2024 6:42pm |
Using the service, assumes that we won't deploy MACI in another way right? As we removed the MACI Address
Using the service, assumes that we won't deploy MACI in another way right? As we removed the MACI Address
Yes, I think so, but the user could also input existing maci address and register it, this is an opened issue: https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci-rpgf/issues/112
Description
NEXT_PUBIC_MACI_START_BLOCK
in environment variables and config filesMaciService.getMaciData
would return{ maciAddress, maciStartBlock }
Related Issue close issue #115