Closed dkelly-echo360 closed 1 year ago
Hello and thanks for your interest in CHIPS. We understand that making partitioned cookies hostname bound is a paradigm shift from domain-bound unpartitioned cross-site cookies.
Here are some solutions that sites can use to migrate to hostname-bound cross-site cookies:
If these solutions do not work for your use case, we are interested in hearing your feedback as to why so that we can work together on new solutions.
Closing this now that #43 is also closed. CHIPS no longer requires cookies to not be set with Domain.
@DCtheTall Hello. I have posed a similar question to privacy sandbox. I saw this issue here and I have a question. https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/privacy-sandbox-dev-support/issues/144
I am aware that the use case in this issue has not been resolved. How should we handle cookies used on multiple subdomains in the future?
@DCtheTall Hello. I have posed a similar question to privacy sandbox. I saw this issue here and I have a question. GoogleChromeLabs/privacy-sandbox-dev-support#144
I am aware that the use case in this issue has not been resolved. How should we handle cookies used on multiple subdomains in the future?
It was my lack of knowledge. I was not aware of the specification changes. My issue was resolved.
How would this work for an application embedded in an iframe that uses multiple subdomains in a 3rd party context?
For example, an org owns: api.example.com account.example.com app1.example.com app2.example.com
There is an authentication token set in a cookie by api.example.com meant to available to all example.com sub-domains. The sites listed are the same party but also need partitioned and keyed to a top level site.