Closed p10tyr closed 5 years ago
Thanks for raising this @ppumkin
There's no specific reason why I did that over any other way. Please feel free to submit a PR with it working how you suggested above and I can release a new version for everyone.
Cheers
Paul
Can you give me permission to push a branch and I'll submit a PR?
Hi Jamie If you fork and then create a branch on your fork you can submit that as a PR.
Thanks
Paul
Fixed that and a couple of other bits too:
Thank you I’ve seen the PR I’ll review and merge tomorrow
Did you manage to review the PR?
PR reviewed, tested and merged, thank you very much @jamietwells
I had to add the previous way of sending back in because of breaking changes. I kept your work in, but just named them as SendAsync, ProcessRequestAsync and BasicTestsAsync.
New version on it's way to NuGet now.
Thanks
Paul
https://github.com/prjseal/SlackBotMessages/blob/6d7fe818abe60bdb5b25cb699aef41b9fcbcaefc/SlackBotMessages/SbmClient.cs#L57
Hi - I used your package to hit the ground running to integrate some test logging into slack. A colleague of mine noticed this line referenced. we were wondering if there was a specific reason you used
.Result
instead of await pattern?There is a situation when running in a IIS pipeline on a NET472 build this will cause a deadlock on this code without
ConfigureAwait(false);