Closed jtragtenberg closed 3 years ago
I used supports in the cup file and had a hard time to take the support out. There could be an indication of that in the documentation. Which configuration I could and shouldn't use for each print
do i need to sand the borders of the top holes?
Should the hall effect sensor be facing this way? witch the fillets facing up?
What about the magnets? should they fit? it would be interesting if there was a fit here to guarantee a centered and levelled position. This hole should fit a magnet perfectly? Should it stay at the bottom of the whole of the surface ?
What about the magnets? should they fit? it would be interesting if there was a fit here to guarantee a centered and levelled position. This hole should fit a magnet perfectly? Should it stay at the bottom of the whole of the surface ?
Assuming the magnet is meant to fit perfectly in the hole, centered and flush with the top surface, this is arguably a 3d modelling issue rather than a documentation issue.
I used supports in the cup file and had a hard time to take the support out. There could be an indication of that in the documentation. Which configuration I could and shouldn't use for each print
This could also be approached by ensuring the STL files have the part modeled in its printing orientation.
It's a good idea though to include information about whether to use supports etc. with the STLs. Unfortunately I don't know of any cross-printer cross-slicer way of sharing this kind of details. A text file may have to suffice.
Yes, we should change the stls orientation so they are ready to print! And I agree we should think of a way to suggest which ones need supports. Maybe a tag at the end on the file name like probatio_block_top_dual_pistons_cap(use_supports).stl or just a “*”. Not the most elegant solution, a table would also be good but I think the file name communicates faster For someone in the printing labor :)
It would be nice to have a table showing
can you think of anything else?
About the piston Magnet fitting I believe there should be a fast way to reparametrize the size of the hole if you could only buy a magnet with different dimensions. For now a fusion 360 file is good enough, but maybe we could design it later in openscad. This would also solve issues with poorly calibrated 3D printers with the right magnet dimensions
I will close this issue here then, since it moved to the appropriate repo
First, what kind of spring should I use? Where do I put the magnet? where do I put the hall effect sensor? Facing which way? What polarity of the magnet is directed to which side? What has to fit perfectly? What I need to use glue? How should I glue it?