Closed postylem closed 2 years ago
Thanks, @postylem! Does your Jupytext not automatically update the *.ipynb files too? If it does, can you commit them?
I changed the PlannerParams that are used as an example to be the same as those used below when they're used for the first exercise.
Note that later on, we say we will "reset" the PlannerParams to their original values (the higher number of refinements, 3500). I think this higher number is a good thing -- it makes the results more interpretable, because the planner plans 'straighter paths'. Can we change this back to the parameters we had? We could also change the starter code in the exercise to use the higher parameters, so that the inconsistency you noticed is resolved.
I changed the coordinates of the obstacles in some examples so the result would be simpler looking.
Can you say a little more about this? Simpler-looking in what way?
I just pushed a commit which
Looks good to me!
Mostly small typos and formatting things as I was going through the notebooks.
Differences that might need to be discussed: