Closed behrman closed 1 year ago
Let me ask Jeff to take a look...
Hi @behrman these are great, thanks! They are all fixed in a recent checkin, and are also fixed in the long arxiv version of the paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00132 ) and this will be reflected the next time it is pushed to arxiv (note that some of the typos below were fixed before, including in the 10/16/2022 version of the book). But thanks, please keep them coming!
page 300, line 30:
- fixed
page 300, line 38:
- fixed in earlier typo fixes (e.g., 10/16/ version).
page 302, lines 28-29:
page 302, line 28: page 302, line 29: we have that -> we define
page 303, line 21:
page 304, line 17:
page 305, lines 31-34:
page 309, lines 31-32:
page 309, line 38: are also based continuous -> are also based on continuous
page 309, lines 39-42: Is the here the same as above? If so, it would be good to use throughout.
page 311, line 40: corset -> coreset
page 311, line 41: how do we construct submodular function -> how do we construct a submodular function
page 312, line 40: cases we wish -> cases, we wish
page 313, line 13: Alternatively, one also “learn” a submodular function -> Alternatively, one can also “learn” a submodular function
page 314, line 32: Wording can be improved: This can be seen quickly easily
page 314, line 42: second order partial derivative -> second-order partial derivative
page 314, line 45: have this property but in fact -> have this property, but in fact
page 315, line 9: I think you meant: There are an almost limited number -> There are an almost unlimited number
page 315, line 45: where is the set of labeled samples -> where is the set of unlabeled samples
page 317, line 7: restrictions as well and this has been widely used -> restrictions as well, and this has been widely used
fixed
page 317, line 16: consists of a homogeneous and for this reason -> ??
fixed (also fixed an earlier, it should be p(x) \propto exp(-E(x)) for energy function E(x).
page 300, line 30: $X \subset Y$ -> $X \subsetneq Y$ page 300, line 38: each others' -> each other's page 302, lines 28-29: You define $m$ in two places, circularly. Below is a possible fix. You could also rewrite to make clear the distinction between the vector and the set function. page 302, line 28: where $m : 2^V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ -> where $m \in \mathbb{R}^V$ page 302, line 29: we have that $m(A)$ -> we define $m(A)$ page 303, line 21: $m_{u,a}$ -> $m_u(a)$ page 304, line 17: $m_u(v) = 1$ -> $mu(v) = 0$ page 305, lines 31-34: If you wish to be consistent earlier notation: $m{u,a}$ -> $m_u(a)$ page 309, lines 31-32: $V$ -> $|V|$ page 309, line 38: are also based continuous -> are also based on continuous page 309, lines 39-42: Is the $n$ here the same as $|V|$ above? If so, it would be good to use $|V|$ throughout. page 311, line 40: corset -> coreset page 311, line 41: how do we construct submodular function -> how do we construct a submodular function page 312, line 40: cases we wish -> cases, we wish page 313, line 13: Alternatively, one also “learn” a submodular function -> Alternatively, one can also “learn” a submodular function page 314, line 32: Wording can be improved: This can be seen quickly easily page 314, line 42: second order partial derivative -> second-order partial derivative page 314, line 45: have this property but in fact -> have this property, but in fact page 315, line 9: I think you meant: There are an almost limited number -> There are an almost unlimited number page 315, line 45: where $U_t$ is the set of labeled samples -> where $U_t$ is the set of unlabeled samples page 317, line 7: restrictions as well and this has been widely used -> restrictions as well, and this has been widely used page 317, line 16: $x$ consists of a homogeneous and for this reason -> ??