Closed michaelrkn closed 9 years ago
Even with a homebrew package you would still need Python and the libraries. The only difference is that Homebrew would install Python and the dependencies for you.
So instead of:
brew install python
pip install localtunnel
You'd do something like:
brew install python-localtunnel
Being a Homebrew and Python fan myself, I like your proposal.
Actually, I think you could even make python a dependency of localtunnel, so you just need to run brew install localtunnel
.
Homebrew recipe sounds great!
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Michael Kaiser-Nyman < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Actually, I think you could even make python a dependency of localtunnel, so you just need to run brew install localtunnel.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/progrium/localtunnel/issues/94#issuecomment-15704479 .
Jeff Lindsay http://progrium.com
as I understood from this https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/wiki/Acceptable-Formulae they don't really like to accept formulaes of software that can be easily installed via pip
@etataurov I'm not sure where you're seeing that.
@michaelrkn I think, I misunderstood the Bindings paragraph
Would love to see a Homebrew recipe for localtunnel too
i don't think it's needed. it's fine to be a python package
That Python version has reached EOL. There is a minimal Go version in master incubating. If there is demand, I'll produce binary releases that work on OS X and Linux.
also ngrok is available through homebrew.
ngrok is now closed source. :(
Hey Jeff - what do you think about providing localtunnel as a Homebrew formula, instead of (or in addition to) installing with pip? I'm a Rubyist who loves localtunnel, and it would be great to be able to install it without having to install Python-specific stuff that I wouldn't otherwise need.
Thanks for your good work.