Create "Object Class" facet in Objects and Advanced Search

[roamye]

Problem Description: We want to create a new facet within the Objects tab and Advanced Search that can facet by Object Class.

Expected Behavior/Solution: Users will be able to facet by Object Class values Physical Object, and Digital Object in Objects tab and Advanced Search.

Requirements:

• [x] - The refinement section of Objects tab will now show the option Object Class
• [x] - New facet will include values such as Physical Object, and Digital Object.
• [x] - Advanced search will include this facet as a new single field.
• [x] - Advanced search options will be a drop down similar to #175 and #176.
• [x] The Object records will display Object Class within the about page and contain the options of: Physical Object, and Digital Object
• [ ] - The following help text will be displayed for each value selection:
• [ ] - Physical Object: Search for Objects that are physical items, such as paintings, sculptures, fossils and other specimens, and archival objects. Individual physical copies of books are included in this class.
• [ ] - Digital Object: Search for Objects that are digital items, such as internet resources (datasets, e-books, and other digital files). Digitized images of collection items that are physical objects can be found with the “Is Online” facet on Physical Objects
• [ ] regression test case - amy

Needed for promotion: If an item on the list is not needed, it should be crossed off but not removed.

• [x] Wireframe/Mockup - Mike
• [x] Help Text - Sarah
• [x] Update mockup - Mike
• [x] Committee discussions - Sarah
• [x] Feasibility/Team discussion - Sarah
• [x] Backend requirements - TBD
• [x] Frontend requirements- TBD
• [x] Questions
• List of questions for discussions. Answers should be documented within the issue.

UAT/LUX Examples:

• https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/results/objects?q=%7B%22text%22%3A%22colors%22%2C%22_lang%22%3A%22en%22%7D&sq=colors
• physical object: https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/object/64a6f0c2-6d58-44d8-8ffe-43ff5d213b62
• Digital object: https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/digital/8d70874b-224e-4d3c-9ae9-823924407442
• Advanced Search: https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/results/objects?q=%7B%22AND%22%3A%5B%7B%22recordType%22%3A%22DigitalObject%22%7D%2C%7B%22name%22%3A%22rabbit%22%7D%5D%7D

Dependencies/Blocks:

• Blocked/Dependent On: https://github.com/project-lux/lux-marklogic/issues/42
• Blocked by: https://github.com/project-lux/lux-marklogic/issues/141

Related Github Issues:

Related links:

• These links can consist of resources, bugherds, etc.

Wireframe/Mockup: Place wireframe/mockup for the proposed solution at end of ticket.

Wireframe:

Advanced Search:

Object record:

[miketullo95]

@roamye wireframe fixed

[clarkepeterf]

@kamerynB FYI the facet is called itemRecordType and the search field is called recordType

[roamye]

The label for the records needs to be added.

So for example, in the record : https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/object/64a6f0c2-6d58-44d8-8ffe-43ff5d213b62

the about section needs to contain the label of [TBD] to show the record is a physical object. This will need to be consistent with the label for Categorized as: People / Group from BH 2333 https://www.bugherd.com/projects/284041/tasks/2333

[kamerynB]

The label should be the same as what is reflected in facets and advanced search.

Examples: Object Class: Physical Object Work Class: Visual Item Person or Group Class: Person etc....

[roamye]

@kamerynB - the req for the classes to be displayed on each req has been updated on all 175-178 issues. I will create some mockups for them and add them when ready.

[roamye]

mockups have been updated for all scope records on issues 175-178