Add search link to show archival sets results containing digital image thumbnails (from 1728)

[gigamorph]

Problem` Description: This is an enhancement to the explore hierarchy feature. Although we now have a icon to indicate archival objects that have digital images, there is no easy way for a user to browse the digital images on the archival collection level.

Expected Behavior/Solution: The hierarchy will have a link to the results page where a user can view records with images. The HAL link will have to cover objects and works.

Requirements:

• link on archival set page
• corresponding object results page (when user follows link)

Needed for promotion:

• [x] Wireframe/Mockup - Mike
• [x] Update mock-up to make link more prominent. Looks like it is part of the list above, but misaligned - Mike
• [x] Feasibility/Team discussion - Sarah
• [x] additional requirements - TBD
• [x] https://github.com/project-lux/lux-middletier/issues/14 (119)
• [ ] Questions
• List of questions for discussions. Answers should be documented within the issue.

UAT/LUX Examples:

• https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/set/5f1ff079-5f3a-4bd6-921a-5c6ae8f88262
• https://lux.collections.yale.edu/view/set/2bbba369-f848-42ee-8b25-b2d56da76b01
• ~Advanced Search Query~ (No longer applicable)
• ~advanced search query~ (No longer applicable)

Dependencies/Blocks:

• Blocked By: Issues that are blocking the completion of the current issue.
• Blocking: Issues being blocked by the completion of the current issue.

Related Github Issues:

• Issues that contain similar work but are not blocking or being blocked by the current issue.

Related links: Bugherd: - https://www.bugherd.com/projects/284041/tasks/851

Wireframe/Mockup:

[ar2674]

@miketullo95 should this be assigned to you instead?

[roamye]

From old tix(https://git.yale.edu/lux-its/lux-web/issues/1728): 12/5/23 Per ticket forming - ready to promote as blocked and needing HAL link completed.

[prowns]

@miketullo95 - this is for you next; mockup needs updating.

[miketullo95]

mock updated @prowns 😄

[kamerynB]

This will require 2 links. One for View objects from this archive with images and the other being View works from this archive with images. The hierarchy shows both works and objects.

cc: @miketullo95

[prowns]

@kkdavis14 - would there ever be works with images in archival hierarchy? I'm thinking not. Only the archival object is digitized.

[kkdavis14]

@prowns I don't think so, archival Objects don't carry any Works, and I think all the Works that are Archives are top level or Series level collections, not Visual Items or Textual Works.

[roamye]

I looked at the third UAT example in tst (here) and it shows me an error. Is that supposed to happen? @kamerynB

[kamerynB]

@roamye I'm not sure why those search links are in the UAT block. The ones to be concerned about are the entity links, ie the first 2 UAT examples. The archives in those entities should have a link saying View records from this archive with images and those links should be valid. I'm not sure where those search links came from.

[roamye]

@kamerynB looks like it was added back in 2023 (old issue). I will strike them out. Thanks Kam.

[jffcamp]

@kamerynB - the link needs to either be bolded as a hotfix or backed out. Also, add a little more space between the list and the link.

[kamerynB]

@jffcamp A PR for the hotfix is already open.

What it will look like:

[roamye]

@kamerynB I believe the archive collection name also needs to be bold to reflect the wireframe in the mockup.

cc: @jffcamp

[kamerynB]

@roamye I've included that in #27. The current entity link has not been bolded since I deployed the SI changes as I accidentally removed that styling when making those changes. That bug was not introduced with this deployment.

cc: @jffcamp

[jffcamp]

@kamerynB - Thanks. Please deploy.

[kamerynB]

Deployed!

cc: @roamye @jffcamp

[roamye]

Approved by UAT

[roamye]

Looks good in prod, closing.