We currently do not have a query which can search for "similar groups/people" based off a person or group record. We need to define what "similar groups/people" includes so a query can be created to search the proposed criteria. Some questions to define the query are below(similar to those in #18)
What algorithm do we use to determine the keywords to then incorporate into the similar query, are we only looking within the reference People/Group, and what weight should we give that criteria?
What about the People/Group related agents should be considered, and what is the weight of each?
What about the People/Group related locations should be considered, and what is the weight of each?
What about the People/Group related concepts should be considered, and what is the weight of each?
What about the People/Group related objects/works time periods should be considered, and what is the weight of each?
Anything else to consider, either directly in the referenced People/Group or related to it? (possibly the object types, related materials, work types)
Expected Behavior/Solution:
TBD
Requirements:
TBD
Needed for promotion:
If an item on the list is not needed, it should be crossed off but not removed.
[ ] Wireframe/Mockup - Mike
[ ] Committee discussions - Sarah
[ ] Feasibility/Team discussion - Sarah
[ ] Backend requirements - TBD
[ ] Frontend requirements- TBD
[ ] Questions
List of questions for discussions. Answers should be documented within the issue.
UAT/LUX Examples:
Example endpoints from LUX to use for development and testing, if applicable.
Problem Description: Must be Implemented with https://github.com/project-lux/lux-frontend/issues/202
We currently do not have a query which can search for "similar groups/people" based off a person or group record. We need to define what "similar groups/people" includes so a query can be created to search the proposed criteria. Some questions to define the query are below(similar to those in #18)
Expected Behavior/Solution: TBD
Requirements: TBD
Needed for promotion: If an item on the list is not needed, it should be crossed off but not removed.
UAT/LUX Examples:
Dependencies/Blocks:
Related Github Issues:
Related links:
Wireframe/Mockup: Place wireframe/mockup for the proposed solution at end of ticket.