Search for Professional Activity type in Advanced Search and Simple Search

[roamye]

Problem Description: There is no way to search for people or groups with a certain professional activity in Advanced Search/Simple Search.

Expected Behavior/Solution: Create a search for single field "Professional Activity Type" in Advanced Search and facet option in Simple Search.

• Help Text is added.

Requirements:

• [x] - Single field "professional activity type" will display in AS
• [x] - Professional activtiy type will be pulled from people or group record "Professional Activities" section.
• [x] - Help Text | Title: Help for Professional Activity Categorized As
• [x] - Help Text | Content: Search for people and groups that carried out professional activities of the given categorization.

Learn more about LUX's advanced search capabilities and common search patterns.

View Advanced Search Help

Query:

"type": "Activity",
"classified_as": [
{
"id": "https://lux.collections.yale.edu/data/concept/11c48705-1114-49aa-8896-c7490678b608",
"type": "Type",
"_label": "Professional Activities",
"equivalent": [
{
"id": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300393177",
"type": "Type",
"_label": "Professional Activities"
}
]
},
{
"id": "https://lux.collections.yale.edu/data/concept/904d7773-aa0c-45e5-9db3-71a4eddd2eaa",
"type": "Type",
"_label": "Pharmaceutical industry--United States"
}

Needed for promotion: If an item on the list is not needed, it should be crossed off but not removed.

• [ ] ~Wireframe/Mockup - Mike~
• [x] Help Text
• [ ] Committee discussions - Sarah
• [ ] Feasibility/Team discussion - Sarah
• [ ] Backend requirements - TBD
• [x] Frontend requirements- TBD
• [x] Are new regression tests required for QA - Amy
• [x] Questions
• List of questions for discussions. Answers should be documented within the issue.
• Do we need one in SS? or does Occupation cover this in SS?
• Answer: From 5/23 team meeting, there should be a simple search facet for this as well
• Should this be a drop down? or someone types in a professional activity?
• Answer: from team meeting 5/23 this should operate as Occupation does in Advanced Search
• What is the help text?

UAT/LUX Examples:

• AS for professional activity type of Pharamaceutical Industry should show a results page include the record below:
• https://lux.collections.yale.edu/view/group/2e68492c-ef49-46ac-ad1a-4960ff46986d

Dependencies/Blocks:

• Blocked By: Issues that are blocking the completion of the current issue.
• Blocking: Issues being blocked by the completion of the current issue.

Related Github Issues:

• FE: https://github.com/project-lux/lux-frontend/issues/268

Related links:

• Bugherd: https://www.bugherd.com/projects/284041/tasks/2231

Wireframe/Mockup: Have All Of

• Professional Activity Type

[roamye]

@clarkepeterf is the possible query listed above correct? or will this need a different query for the new facet?

[roamye]

added help text - this is TBD & need core team to review.

[clarkepeterf]

@kamerynB Do you want to take this one?

Things you'll need to do:

1. Update this spreadsheet with the new field: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lwn2tzRNRHtLTPMNWvOsy5fYiIfY4wkthhvgctQ8Hpg/edit#gid=538027221
   • copy existing row and then modify, some colums are auto-generated
   • I think agentTypeId is a good base field to start with and modify
2. Download as TSV
3. Put contents of TSV into scripts/generateIndexConf/input.tsv
4. Run scripts/generateIndexConf/generate.py - this generates a new config/contentDatabaseConfGenerated.json
5. Update src/main/ml-modules/base/root/config/searchTermConfig.mjs and src/main/ml-modules/base/root/config/userFacingConfig.mjs

Feel free to reach out to me with any questions

[kamerynB]

@clarkepeterf Yes! Sounds good! I'll assign it to me.

[kamerynB]

Notes from 6/26/24 meeting:

1. The carried_out data point may not always be professional activities, but if it is, it would make things easier.
2. In the future, assuming 1 might cause problems.
3. It might be possible to use exclusions in XPath. @kamerynB Will investigate and reach out to @clarkepeterf if necessary.