Create new "DATA" tenant in DEV

[jffcamp]

Problem Description: We need an environment where we can test new datasets without disrupting the regular development flow.

Expected Behavior/Solution: Creating a new lux-data-dev tenant will allow new datasets and new code dependent on the data to be deployed and tested.

Requirements: List of details required for the completion of the issue or requirements for the feature/bug. This can also include requirements that lie outside of the teams such as new design docs or clarification from an outside source.

Needed for promotion: If an item on the list is not needed, it should be crossed off but not removed.

• ~[ ] Wireframe/Mockup - Mike~
• ~[ ] Committee discussions - Sarah~
• [x] Feasibility/Team discussion - Sarah
• Backend requirements -
  • [x] Increase storage - Xinjian
  • [x] Create the tenant - Peter
• Middle tier & Frontend - Seong
  • [x] Create new middle-tier and frontend
  • [x] DNS request - lux-data-dev.collections.yale.edu
• [x] Frontend requirements - Deploy frontend - Kameryn
• [x] Are new regression tests required for QA - Amy
• [x] Questions
• List of questions for discussions. Answers should be documented within the issue.

UAT/LUX Examples: N/A - this won't go to UAT and is intended for internal purposes

Dependencies/Blocks:

• Blocked By: Issues that are blocking the completion of the current issue. https://github.com/project-lux/lux-marklogic/pull/153
• Blocking: Issues being blocked by the completion of the current issue.

Related Github Issues:

• Frontend and middle tier: https://github.com/project-lux/lux-middletier/issues/63

Related links:

• These links can consist of resources, bugherds, etc.

Wireframe/Mockup: Place wireframe/mockup for the proposed solution at end of ticket.

[clarkepeterf]

I don't think this needs to be reviewed as part of the normal UAT process. but the data-dev tenant is created and supports the following instance of LUX: https://lux-data-dev.collections.yale.edu/

[roamye]

If the data-dev tenant is created can this issue be closed? Or are we still missing the two boxes that are unchecked?

@clarkepeterf @kamerynB

[clarkepeterf]

@roamye those steps are also done - I just checked them off - all good to close this item