Update place relatedToConcept to remove Place of Publication relationship.

[roamye]

Problem Description: Place of Publication and Published At this Place relationships are not desired in Related Lists. ~https://github.com/project-lux/lux-frontend/issues/343~, the related lists will need to be updated.

Expected Behavior/Solution: Place of publication will no longer be a part of the related list: https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/api/related-list/place?name=relatedToConcept&uri=https%3A%2F%2Flux.collections.yale.edu%2Fdata%2Fconcept%2Fd067d500-e6ea-4da2-9a2d-18bcd58e21dc

Requirements:

• update related lists to no longer include the Place of Publication or Published At this Place relationships.

Needed for promotion: If an item on the list is not needed, it should be crossed off but not removed.

• [x] Wireframe/Mockup - Mike
• [x] Committee discussions - Sarah
• [x] Feasibility/Team discussion - Sarah
• [ ] Backend requirements - TBD
• [ ] Frontend requirements- TBD
• [ ] Are new regression tests required for QA - Amy
• [x] Questions
• List of questions for discussions. Answers should be documented within the issue.

UAT/LUX Examples:

• This concept's Related Locations in TST should not have any Place of Publication relationships: https://lux-front-tst.collections.yale.edu/view/concept/d067d500-e6ea-4da2-9a2d-18bcd58e21dc
• This concept's Related Locations in PRD does havePlace of Publication relationships: https://lux.collections.yale.edu/view/concept/d067d500-e6ea-4da2-9a2d-18bcd58e21dc

Dependencies/Blocks: N/A

Related Github Issues:

• ~FE: https://github.com/project-lux/lux-frontend/issues/343~ (not necessary)

Related links:

• Bugherd: https://www.bugherd.com/projects/284041/tasks/2493

Wireframe/Mockup: Current:

Updated:

[clarkepeterf]

@azaroth42 @roamye

I have a couple of questions:

1. The ticket explicitly mentions removing "Place of Publication" relationships from the Related Locations list on Concept pages. Do we also want to remove them from the Related Locations list on Agent and Place pages?
2. Do we want to also remove "Published At" relationships on Place pages? E.g. on the page for New York:
   • 

[roamye]

@clarkepeterf - bringing this to uat discussion tomorrow. will update you with answers afterwards.

[azaroth42]

IMO remove all place-of-publications from all related lists.

[clarkepeterf]

@azaroth42 Thanks, I'm going to interpret this as a yes to both 1 and 2 from my comment above.

[roamye]

Approved by UAT

[roamye]

Looks good in prod. closing.