project-lux / lux-marklogic

Code, issues, and resources related to LUX MarkLogic
Other
3 stars 2 forks source link

META: Add Facets For Other Scope's Data Types (from 1098) #42

Closed gigamorph closed 2 months ago

gigamorph commented 4 months ago

Problem Description

Currently there exists the facet People or Groups to filter "People & Groups:" (agents) by their data type. This does not exist for any other scopes

Extension: these options will also need to be added to Advanced Search

Questions:

Expected Outcome:

Create facets for other scopes

Needed

Blocked/Dependencies: Blocking:

Links

ar2674 commented 4 months ago

@miketullo95 should this be assigned to you instead?

miketullo95 commented 4 months ago

@ar2674 yep! thanks

roamye commented 3 months ago

conversation from old ticket:

@prowns I'd like to mark this issue for forming.

Created with @kd736 based on a bugherd. I'm not sure who should decide on what to call the facets.

Originally posted by @pc754 in https://git.yale.edu/lux-its/marklogic/issues/1098#issuecomment-24145

I think the review process would be that @hw396 preps a wireframe with proposed facet labels to bring to Interactions for naming.

Originally posted by @prowns in https://git.yale.edu/lux-its/marklogic/issues/1098#issuecomment-24147

I'm going to assign @hw396 so that she can work the wireframe + labels

Originally posted by @pc754 in https://git.yale.edu/lux-its/marklogic/issues/1098#issuecomment-24168

roamye commented 2 months ago

@miketullo95 will prioritize meta tix to create mockups for facets + advanced search. thank u

roamye commented 2 months ago

mockups for all child tickets should be updated to reflect those in this comment: https://github.com/project-lux/lux-frontend/issues/176#issuecomment-2059560556

roamye commented 2 months ago

Other tickets have been updated to reflect the discussion in BA/UX meeting. However, per the meeting we need clarification on where the data for the sub-tickets are coming from. Is the data already existing?

For example, Work Class will have the option for Visual Work. However, we can filter by Visual Work through Work Type facet. Does adding Work Class cause a redundancy?

Will be brought to Team Meeting to clarify. Afterward @miketullo95 will work on updating the AS mockups for the child tickets.

cc: @prowns

roamye commented 2 months ago

From teams meeting last week 4/18 - the data comes from the same model as people or groups. So it is different data than we had thought from the comment above. Mike to work on updating the AS mockups for the child tickets. @miketullo95

prowns commented 2 months ago

Ok to close from UAT, as the issues all have their own tickets now.