Closed davechod closed 9 years ago
HI, @davechod. Mind pasting a screenshot so that folks don't need to grant permissions to a third party app in order to view?
Here are some screenshots:
I have a few concerns:
I'm still trying to think through the re-ordering but think that a decision there should, again, be based on the user-friendliness of agency staff implementing this policy. If that conflicts any with the goal of lining up these components to a separate initiative, I'm not sure we should do this.
I like the way this organizes the information in general to align with the framework CIOC is working on. I also like the Performance section. Agree with @gbinal that image may not be needed. Seems a bit distracting to me. The Strategic Priorities section doesn't seem to fit all that well. Open Data is a small part of what these groups do, and not listing other groups makes it seem like others are main drivers of these priorities (e.g., data.gov). The priorities are directly tied to open data. Would suggest removing this section, or maybe just making it a bulleted list of the major players
Agree a redesign is in order, but I think we will want to include more. @davechod, can you weigh on what should be front and center on #479?
Added organizational construct image used by the Federal CIO Council; organized resources into the corresponding categories; updated Open Data Engagement section to current numbering system.
@philipashlock -- I updated the current structure per your feedback. Let me know your thoughts. As for the numbering scheme, I agree it could be improved but keeping the section headings is valuable. Perhaps we can modify to [Section - Date], rather than [Section - Item#].
Preview can be found here: https://jekit.codeforamerica.org/davechod/project-open-data.github.io/master/