Closed ghjm closed 4 years ago
Once this is merged I will basically need to replace controller
with node
for places I used to start as a controller. Is that correct?
If that is correct, then the perf tests will need to be updated since it starts receptor as controller.
Yes, that is correct @elyezer. If this PR is accepted, then everything that runs receptor controller
will need to switch to receptor node
.
I would put in an alias that makes the two strictly equivalent, but I can't see a reasonable way to do that with the way config.py
is currently structured.
@ghjm thanks for the clarification, I can work on updating the tests if this PR gets accepted.
Everything is node.
All hail Node!
Right now if you run
receptor controller
, the differences fromreceptor node
are:--server-disable
option to suppress starting a listener is unavailable--peer
options to make outbound connectionssocket_path
option, but it doesn't actually do anythingIntuitively, you would expect that
receptor controller
is somehow a different mode of operation or does something thatreceptor node
doesn't do, but this is not actually the case.