topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
tagging bendangelo because you fixed meva/acc/enmity
Open topaz-bot opened 4 years ago
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
tagging bendangelo because you fixed meva/acc/enmity
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
Is this relevant? https://www.bg-wiki.com/bg/PDIF
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
It appears to be very relevant.
It looks to me as if Tiamat's Ratio in the first test is 1.237 and cRatio moves to 2.237 (because Tiamat is 20 levels over.)
cRatio in the second example appears to me to be 3.201 (if I understand these formulas correctly)
If cRatio of 2.237=429 average hit, proportionally cratio of 3.201 would indicate an expected average hit closer to 614. The average attack appears to have only increased by roughly half that amount.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
I really don't know much about this. Best thing to do would be to create some isolated test cases on retail, then we can run the same tests to compare the differences.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
I wonder if this is why SAMs are saying that their Tachi: Gekko yields average amounts lower than it did on retail. Even if the cratio is handled in a different location for WSs (scripts) than it does for (mob) melee attacks (core). Edit: SAMs with way better gear on DSP servers than they had on retail doing less than they would do on retail...
Edit 2: SAM WSs should probably be in line with retail now that Overwhelm works.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
I'm not a DD specialist, but I can absolutely vouch that something is wrong with Tachi: Gekko damage, whether it be this issue or another.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
Some other ws are also underperforming, Raging Rush for example
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
I'm inclined to say otherwise, unless you mean compared to how they were performing on DSP earlier. In that case, see github/DarkstarProject/darkstar - PR 2968, where double attack can no longer proc on every single hit.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
I meant in general, might be only at 75 cap though
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
This is likely more to do with mob stats than the damage system. All my reviews of the system compared to BG-wiki show that it is accurate.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago 
The majority of mobs should be fairly accurate just by being calculated based on their job, with most deviations from that being NMs. If it is the mobs stats, then I think this and Darkstar Issue 3072 may actually be the same issue (though Darkstar Issue 3072 wasn't nearly as bad as I initially thought, because of someone derping a conf setting).
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
Mobs could have bonuses(in retail) that aren't part of their general calculations. For example, even after the magic system was "fixed," I still do way more dmg to groundskeepers than I did in retail with the same equipment.
topaz-bot
commented
4 years ago
Some definitely do, but the majority will be simple "my job is xxx/xxx".
I remember some guys on ffxi community sites arguing over what a mobs job was based solely on its vit score. I know exceptions exist, those guys did not. I know we have a ranking for the stats in the mob family table, and much of that is copy pasta that hasn't really been check against retail. As an example: someone adds a new type of rabbit from new expansion, copies an existing rabbits sql's line and changes only what they know for sure is different.
tl;dr yeah very possible the stats are off. Not so easy to see which way they are off though.
I have:
Client Version (type
/verin game) 30160203_0:Server Version (type
revisionin game) :"Unknown" (server was built using yesterday's code I assume it's up to date)Source Branch (master/stable) Master
Additional Information (Steps to reproduce/Expected behavior) :
I have for many months now suspected that something is off about the way darkstar handles attack/defense for players and mobs. I wish I could point out specifics, but I just don't know retail damage formulas as well as I do retail HNM behavior.
To give a couple of examples: If I'm fighting a level 95 mob which possess 531 attack vs my 422 defense the average hit from that mob will be: 429
If I'm fighting that same level 95 mob after it has recieved a 75% attack boost (placing its attack at 929) the average hit will be: 531
That doesn't seem to me to be nearly the boost one would expect. If the test were conducted using physical- gear and phalanx the damage difference of adding 398 attack would shrink to the point where it's hard to even spot.
As another example there are a couple of retail mobs out there with very high defense. Genbu is a good example. If I have my Excalibur out at retail Genbu I will sometimes hit 0s. No matter how much defense I give Darkstar Genbu I cannot reproduce that behavior (and as far as I know retail genbu has no phalanx effects)
A year ago word on the street on nas server was that enmity, meva, accuracy, and attack were all functioning in a non-retail fashion. After several updates to address each of those systems, these days the word on the street is "Attack gear helps more than it did on retail." So all of this leads me to believe the attack/defense formulas need to be double checked for retail accuracy.