Closed ashcrow closed 8 years ago
Interesting. I was working on this too a little yesterday trying to do it (unsuccessfully) with go get
.
Yeah, it's a bit odd. I think following this pattern makes it a matter of figuring out the Travis runtime.
I'm going to switch testing over to 2.7
until something like https://github.com/jplana/python-etcd/pull/176 is in place.
I'd say Travis has pretty much already reviewed your patch and he's happy.
Pretty cool to see E2E tests in the logs now!
Looks GTG but I'll give @cooktheryan a chance to look before merging.
Ah, sorry, I see now this is actually assigned to @cooktheryan.
@ashcrow said I can steal this... bwahahahah. :smiling_imp:
@rh-atomic-bot try
@rh-atomic-bot r+
:pushpin: Commit 4846e79 has been approved by mbarnes
@rh-atomic-bot r-
@rh-atomic-bot r+
:pushpin: Commit 4846e79 has been approved by mbarnes
@rh-atomic-bot retry
@rh-atomic-bot retry
@rh-atomic-bot try
@rh-atomic-bot: retry
:hourglass: Trying commit 4846e79 with merge 1847ed0...
:sunny: Test successful - travis State: approved=mbarnes try=True
:hourglass: Testing commit 4846e79 with merge 2a5ddd6...
:sunny: Test successful - travis Approved by: mbarnes Pushing 2a5ddd62aa4be6607bb9236051f76fd392458d34 to master...
This change updates Travis to use Python2.7 and run the BDD tests.
The reason for the version bump is due to
python-etcd
using non-positional args in string formatting which was added in 2.7/3.1. I have an upstream PR that will hopefully be accepted (https://github.com/jplana/python-etcd/pull/176).