Closed cdrage closed 8 years ago
aint that just empty files?
@goern nah, just most example (nulecule-library, etc.) use .yaml files instead for defining graph, Nulecule, etc. Shouldn't we reflect the spec to be the same?
yaml looks much cleaner imo
ah :) actually the Nulecule Specification defines that the formats that could be used are JSON or YAML. What is the rational to remove one of these and reduce freedom of choice?
For cleaner reading and ease of introduction :) We're not removing it, we'll just convert them to yaml.
edit: we already tell the user they can use ini, yaml or json for Nulecule / graphs / etc.
I would like to keep both, as I personally dont like YAML ;)
other opinion?
I like YAML:P But I still see the benefit of presenting user with both versions.
Within the /spec folder I believe we should be using yaml examples rather than json as it's the go-to format when we do our blog-posting as well as our implementation.
Thoughts?