Our examples should be using yml not json.

[cdrage]

Within the /spec folder I believe we should be using yaml examples rather than json as it's the go-to format when we do our blog-posting as well as our implementation.

Thoughts?

[goern]

aint that just empty files?

[cdrage]

@goern nah, just most example (nulecule-library, etc.) use .yaml files instead for defining graph, Nulecule, etc. Shouldn't we reflect the spec to be the same?

yaml looks much cleaner imo

[goern]

ah :) actually the Nulecule Specification defines that the formats that could be used are JSON or YAML. What is the rational to remove one of these and reduce freedom of choice?

[cdrage]

For cleaner reading and ease of introduction :) We're not removing it, we'll just convert them to yaml.

edit: we already tell the user they can use ini, yaml or json for Nulecule / graphs / etc.

[goern]

I would like to keep both, as I personally dont like YAML ;)

other opinion?

[vpavlin]

I like YAML:P But I still see the benefit of presenting user with both versions.