Open sburnett opened 10 years ago
This doesn't work as well as you might think. Nice is remarkably ineffective. (I'll share a paper with you that talks more about this.)
We did polling and then use SIGSTOP / SIGCONT (at least of Linux systems) to better enforce CPU restrictions.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sam Burnett notifications@github.comwrote:
Use the nice syscall to decrease priority of sandboxed execution.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/projectbismark/censorscope/issues/58 .
Very good to know. Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:45:49AM -0800, JustinCappos wrote:
This doesn't work as well as you might think. Nice is remarkably ineffective. (I'll share a paper with you that talks more about this.)
We did polling and then use SIGSTOP / SIGCONT (at least of Linux systems) to better enforce CPU restrictions.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sam Burnett notifications@github.comwrote:
Use the nice syscall to decrease priority of sandboxed execution.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/projectbismark/censorscope/issues/58 .
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/projectbismark/censorscope/issues/58#issuecomment-31864553
Use the
nice
syscall to decrease priority of sandboxed execution.