Open eLvErDe opened 4 years ago
@neiljerram WDYT?
In terms of need.... I guess I can see that some people prefer to have everything on their system packaged. But this is quite a lot, given that there's a reasonable alternative of just downloading the calicoctl binary:
curl --fail --location '$(URL)' -o $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/calicoctl
In terms of implementation... If we did package calicoctl, it should follow our current packaging architecture, which is
We might need to tweak the "WTFPL" :smile:
WDYT @caseydavenport ?
For the license my point is: just relicense it as you want, I'm not claiming any copyright to make it easier
@neiljerram yeah I agree with that general split.
I do think that some people will not want calicoctl packaged together with Felix, so this would probably need to be a new package rather than added to the existing ones.
Oh yes, definitely a different package. But if we start doing this, that package can go into our PPAs at https://launchpad.net/~project-calico.
So @eLvErDe if you'd like to take this forward, please raise the corresponding PRs against the calicoctl and packaging repos.
Hello,
It could be great to provide calicoctl packages of calico's Ubuntu PPA.
Here is my Debian packaging building package for any architecture by downloading binaries from GitHub: