how about FluentMessage, then? I'm concerned about the naming conflict with ast::Message. I understand that it's not really a problem in code, because the module namespacing works to our advantage. But conceptually, I'd prefer for these two message to have distinct names.
zbraniecki
commented
5 years ago
how about
FluentMessage, then? I'm concerned about the naming conflict withast::Message. I understand that it's not really a problem in code, because the module namespacing works to our advantage. But conceptually, I'd prefer for these two message to have distinct names.Originally posted by @stasm in https://github.com/projectfluent/fluent-rs/pull/120