Closed sbrl closed 3 years ago
yep! thank you for reporting it!
The issue is that FluentBundle
was renamed FluentBundleBase
and is no longer publicly accessible in the documentation despite still being available in the public API through the type FluentBundle
aliases. FluentBundleBase
needs to be publicly re-exported.
I'm not sure how to re-export it so that in the documentation it shows as FluentBundle
.
The only reason we have the Base
is so that we can avoid duplication between FluentBundle
and concurrent::FluentBundle
, and I'd like to have docs on both be docs on those two names.
Any idea how to approach it?
Well as a user I would just prefer FluentBundleBase
to be publicly accessible and for that reason you mentioned to be documented in the API with a introduction that redirects people to the type aliases for actual use. It keeps it as single method in the code and in the search and is easy to implement, exposing implementation details aren't great but often the simplest solution. That being said there are options.
For a struct like FluentBundle
the methods are the most important thing to be visible for me (I found this issue while trying to find documentation for a method), so you could write and implement a common trait and have that trait publicly accessible but sealed so it can't be implemented.
There's also always the option to implementing it as a macro to generate two distinct concrete types, but I don't think that would be worth the overhead/complexity.
Any idea how to approach it?
Maybe instead of using a type
you should get away by declaring it as so in the lib.rs
file:
pub use FluentBundleBase as FluentBundle;
This will definitely work when importing the module. I do not know if you can use this in the same module as the one that defines FluentBundleBase
.
I fixed doc links for 0.13, but there's still more to be done to clean up the docs between FluentBundleBase
, FluentBundle
and concurrent::FluentBundle
.
A lot of work went into improving the docs!
See https://docs.rs/fluent-bundle/0.15.0/fluent_bundle/ and https://docs.rs/fluent-syntax/0.11.0/fluent_syntax/
Hope that solves it! Open a new issue/PR when needed
The
FluentBundle
struct, although present in the introduction text of the documentation, is not actually documented. The link there toFluentBundle
sends me here, but I see a 404:I assume that this is a bug?