Closed kianfar77 closed 2 years ago
Merging #365 (8acd92b) into master (2bf0360) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #365 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.69% 93.69%
=======================================
Files 95 95
Lines 4823 4823
Branches 473 473
=======================================
Hits 4519 4519
Misses 304 304
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
core/src/main/scala/io/projectglow/Glow.scala | 95.65% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8b0bcd6...8acd92b. Read the comment docs.
Also, I think it would be helpful to add documentation to the GWAS methods explicitly stating that the phenotype and covariate dataframe indices need to be in the same order as the values array of the variant data. Or add an input to the methods that takes the ordered sample IDs returned by glow.wgr.get_sample_ids
and handle the re-ordering in the method
@kianfar77 please address comments from @karenfeng and we'll merge this in, thanks
@williambrandler This needs much more work. The documentation on website is out of date after we I simplified APIs and made changes to WGR to match Regenie. I was in the middle of documenting stuff and this PR is a WIP. Never got the chance to work on it more.
OK, set a meeting on monday
@williambrandler This needs much more work. The documentation on website is out of date after we I simplified APIs and made changes to WGR to match Regenie. I was in the middle of documenting stuff and this PR is a WIP. Never got the chance to work on it more.
Signed-off-by: kianfar77 kiavash.kianfar@databricks.com
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
(Details)
How is this patch tested?
(Details)