codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 92.36%. Comparing base (
4fb1c8d) to head (984abbc). Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #642 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.36% 92.36% ======================================= Files 126 126 Lines 7357 7357 Branches 626 626 ======================================= Hits 6795 6795 Misses 562 562 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/projectglow/glow/pull/642/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/projectglow/glow/pull/642/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow) | `92.36% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
For some reason
setuptoolsin conda is a little different. Hopefully this change will fix the conda build.How is this patch tested?
(Details)
To run Spark 4 tests against your PR, include
[SPARK4]in the title.