codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 92.36%. Comparing base (
d2b415d) to head (e4b1797).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #645 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.36% 92.36% ======================================= Files 126 126 Lines 7357 7357 Branches 626 626 ======================================= Hits 6795 6795 Misses 562 562 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/projectglow/glow/pull/645/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/projectglow/glow/pull/645/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow) | `92.36% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
The snapshot build doesn't seem stable enough yet.
How is this patch tested?
(Describe any other testing)