codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 92.31%. Comparing base (
e08907f) to head (2c0ea4b).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #656 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 92.37% 92.31% -0.06% ========================================== Files 127 127 Lines 7419 7440 +21 Branches 605 602 -3 ========================================== + Hits 6853 6868 +15 - Misses 566 572 +6 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/projectglow/glow/pull/656/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/projectglow/glow/pull/656/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow) | `92.31% <71.42%> (-0.06%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=projectglow#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Added function. Using interpolation method R7 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantile#Estimating_quantiles_from_a_sample. This is the same default as excel, R, and Julia.
How is this patch tested?
(Describe any other testing)
To run Spark 4.0 tests, add
[SPARK4]to the pull request title.