Closed snazy closed 4 months ago
Thinking a bit more about this proposal, it's probably not good to implement this, because a) a lot of documentation changes are needed b) basically all downstream components (helm chart, k8s operator) would break c) breaking changes for users
Sorry, but I disagree for :nessie-quarkus-cli
: it's a bad name. I think we should tackle that part of the proposal.
nessie-quarkus-cli
is a standalone tool. Renaming it should not have any downstream effects.
Not sure if we have a separate issue for that, but renaming the "content generator" tool might also be worth the trouble for the sake of clarify for end users.
I'm okay w/ renaming these two tools. Can you open issues or PRs?
For nessie-quarkus-cli: https://github.com/projectnessie/nessie/issues/8481 – will tackle it soon-ish
Rename proposals:
:nessie-quarkus
to:nessie-server
(container image name stays as it is)nessie-server
(currently:quarkus-app
):nessie-quarkus-cli
to:nessie-server-admin
nessie-server-admin
(currently:quarkus-app
):nessie-quarkus-tests
to:nessie-server-tests
:nessie-quarkus-common
to:nessie-server-common
:nessie-quarkus-auth
to:nessie-server-auth
(Ignoring CLI tools in this issue)
/cc @adutra @dimas-b