I noticed the different names of this repository (potos-image) and the provided container image (potos-iso-builder). After some thoughts I think it could make sense to rename the repository itself also to potos-iso-builder. This seems to better capture the intention and content of the repo as it mainly contains the glue code but not the image itself. In addition using the term iso is probably also better to avoid confusion with image like in "picture".
What do you think? Should we rename the repository to potos-iso-builder?
I like the idea. It also implies that once potos is able to generate ready made disk images for VMs, we would have a new repo potos-vm-builder (or so)...
Description
I noticed the different names of this repository (
potos-image
) and the provided container image (potos-iso-builder
). After some thoughts I think it could make sense to rename the repository itself also topotos-iso-builder
. This seems to better capture the intention and content of the repo as it mainly contains the glue code but not the image itself. In addition using the termiso
is probably also better to avoid confusion with image like in "picture".What do you think? Should we rename the repository to
potos-iso-builder
?Additional Information
No response