Closed tobru closed 3 years ago
What I don't like yet is the fact that the Project Syn CLI would end up being named syn-cli
whereas there would be much nicer names like synctl
. Otoh this naming scheme mainly describes the name of the tool but not of the binary :smile: It would be confusing for sure.
We might find a simpler naming scheme? This proposed one feels a bit to strict to me. And ideas?
We might find a simpler naming scheme? This proposed one feels a bit to strict to me. And ideas?
We could just loosely define it: The name must contain the word "syn", the type of the tool and it should contain the purpose if possible.
Thanks @simu for the good input, I incorporated your idea into the proposal and I personally like it now very much :+1:
After reading the latest comments I wasn't satisfied with the proposed naming scheme anymore, it was just to strict IMHO. So I split it up into "Display Name" and "Binary Name" and have made it less strict. WDYT? Pinging the recent commenters @simu @corvus-ch
New SDD describing the new tool naming scheme.
Addresses and closes #106
Checklist