Closed mcmcphillips closed 11 months ago
@mcmcphillips Could you please provide patient bundles for this issue? Our team has no ability of replicating this without the patients being used.
@mcmcphillips This JSON appears to be a MongoDB export of a bunch of data. We will need JSON FHIR patient bundles to reproduce and debug this in our environment.
I took a peek at this measure in MADiE. It seems the SDEs are what is causing the coverage to not be 100%. Is it possible that the measure developer recently added SDEs to the measure and did not expect them to affect coverage?
@hossenlopp Sorry, let me get back to you
@hossenlopp
I've provided the testcase bundles, measure bundle, and valusets. Let me know if I can provide any more information.
CMS349ValueSets.txt CMS349TestCaseBundles.txt CMS349MeasureBundle.txt
I have also posed the question to the measure developers on ONC jira and will update here accordingly
Summary
Updates to FQM execution appear to have modified the coverage of an existing measure from 100% to 85% and measure developers are requesting an explanation as to why this may have happened.
External Tracking Ticket
https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/support/browse/BONNIEMAT-1525
Expected Behavior
Updates to fqm-execution would not modify existing coverage of a measure
Version or Commit
Inputs (e.g. Measure Bundle, Patient Bundle, CQL Library)
CMS349FHIR-v0.0.001-FHIR4 (2) (2).zip
Relevant Calculation Options (e.g. Measurement Period, meta.profile Validation)
cql-to-elm Version Used for Measure Logic Translation (if known)
Any Additional Info