Closed Leonid99 closed 6 months ago
Found #202 after publishing this PR. Should I just close this one? (They are identical, except for the expected format of the command line flag).
I think the other PR is mostly ready to go. Would you be interested in adding to the tests as mentioned in the comments after I merge it?
If you have any comments on the other PR, feel free to contribute there.
If you have any comments on the other PR, feel free to contribute there.
Left a few comments.
@SuperQ I rebased this branch on top of the one by @jeffrey4l to address my own remarks in his #202. Would you be interested in me rebasing this branch to resolve conflicts, so that we can merge it? I will obviously keep @jeffrey4l 's commits untouched to keep proper credit.
Before this change, the expected format of listening on vsock was "--web.listen-address=vsock://:9100". However, this URI-inspired format is probably confusing, especially given that it doesn't really support the host portion of the URI and that listening on TCP doesn't support the "http://:9100" syntax. This commit changes the expected format for vsock to be --web.listen-address=vsock:9100.