Open emilebosch opened 4 years ago
That's definitely a good path forwards, I'm not a pronto contributor so this is just a user perspective, but let me add that sparing users the following 8 dependencies which are rather big gems
gitlab
octokit
httparty
faraday
sawyer
multi_xml
terminal-table
addressable
is quite something.
For that reason, I've put together a branch that's taking a stab at this. Specs are green. After I looked at it again and reviewed some things I'll likely make a pull request out of it. Note though that it's more of an easy route so far, it's not taking gem cutting into consideration.
@bogn83 Good stuff its a start! Would be nice if the contributors would give this a blessing !
Hi, I love pronto but I don't want the extra deps. Because:
Is it maybe an idea to split things out? We can choose a migration path like this:
We make a
pronto-core
that includes nothing. only the local runner. This is for people that just want pronto without the gitlab/github integration.We can then make 2 gems one for gitlab, one for GitHub. And we add then as deps to pronto gem.
It would look like this in the end:
Is this maybe a path forwards? Thanks a lot! <3