Closed nederdirk closed 3 years ago
Was this a regression recently introduced?
I think so, as we didn't encounter the same problem before. However, I'm not entirely sure and I'm not interested in the finger-pointing game :smile_cat:
Merging #1769 (db6641c) into master (1a3140e) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1769 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 87.87% 87.89% +0.01%
Complexity 7826 7826
============================================
Files 267 267
Lines 22543 22543
============================================
+ Hits 19810 19814 +4
+ Misses 2733 2729 -4
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
5-max | 87.89% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
7.4 | 87.89% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
agnostic | 73.34% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
mysql | 69.89% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
pgsql | 69.82% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
sqlite | 67.81% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Propel/Runtime/ActiveQuery/Criteria.php | 89.97% <100.00%> (+0.44%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1a3140e...db6641c. Read the comment docs.
All good - if anything we would rather use this to improve our code review skills :) After all, we approved and merged without seeing this. Anyway, we do need a 2nd signoff on this to merge.
With the latest
master
build we ran into the problem thatCOUNT(*)
-queries to ourorder
table failed. This patch ensures that the setting for identifier quoting is properly observed.Note that I deliberately ignored the
getSql
helper-function in the test, as this behaviour is precisely what thegetSql
helper-function hides.