Closed vkrause closed 3 years ago
I wasn't able to reproduce this using the Linux 0.2.0 binary on Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS, with the same weekly planet dump (2020-07-13) Can you ensure you had enough disk space? For an entire planet you will need around 1TB to be safe, including tempfiles that are only being used during expand
I tried with a self-compiled version meanwhile, with extra debug output around that assert in the hope of creating a smaller test case. That interestingly didn't trigger the problem at all, and should only differ from 0.2.0 in a few docs commits otherwise. Disk space should not be an issue, this is all running on a new 2TB SSD.
I'll try again with a self-compiled version and unmodified sources, if that also works this would seem to be rather a problem with the pre-compiled binary (not necessarily in general, but regarding compatibility with my system probably), rather than a problem in the code or the input data.
Compiling the binary and the test I ran above were on AWS x86 instances - I haven't used it outside of that specific environment, so it's possible there is some issue with the pre-compiled binary
Tried locally compiled unmodified 0.2.0 code now, works perfectly fine as well, so it's just a weird compatibility issue of the binary. Sorry for the noise, and thanks for the great tool, performs beautifully after the initial import :)
Using the pre-compiled 0.2.0 Linux binary I get the following assert when trying to load a full planet pbf file:
Using a smaller extract worked fine.