fix: removing hydrosphere example, because it not supported any…

[wallhided]

fixes #208 Removed example of usage sak-hydrosphere.

[gitguardian[bot]]

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request

| GitGuardian id | Secret | Commit | Filename | | | -------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------- | --------------- | -------------------- | | [804990](https://dashboard.gitguardian.com/incidents/804990?occurrence=35837557) | Generic High Entropy Secret | a2d768076e590dce88449ff1da0cbb7829535a54 | examples/hydrosphere/main.tf | [View secret](https://github.com/provectus/swiss-army-kube/commit/a2d768076e590dce88449ff1da0cbb7829535a54#diff-6151321eada364a18dc7f37232d46b2c2fd6bbbac8baabcb1991adaaaeec4035L128) |

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code. 2. Replace and store your secret safely. [Learn here](https://blog.gitguardian.com/secrets-api-management?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) the best practices. 3. Revoke and [rotate this secret](https://docs.gitguardian.com/secrets-detection/detectors/generics/generic_high_entropy_secret#revoke-the-secret?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment). 4. If possible, [rewrite git history](https://blog.gitguardian.com/rewriting-git-history-cheatsheet?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment). Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data. To avoid such incidents in the future consider - following these [best practices](https://blog.gitguardian.com/secrets-api-management/?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials - install [secret detection on pre-commit](https://docs.gitguardian.com/internal-repositories-monitoring/integrations/git_hooks/pre_commit?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

---

<sup>🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Our GitHub checks need improvements? Share your feedbacks!</sup>

[github-actions[bot]]

💰 Infracost estimate: monthly cost will increase by $285 📈

Project	Previous	New	Diff
provectus/swiss-army-kube	$0	$285	+$285

Infracost output

``` Project: provectus/swiss-army-kube + module.argocd.aws_kms_key.this +$1.00 + Customer master key +$1.00 + Requests Monthly cost depends on usage +$0.03 per 10k requests + ECC GenerateDataKeyPair requests Monthly cost depends on usage +$0.10 per 10k requests + RSA GenerateDataKeyPair requests Monthly cost depends on usage +$0.10 per 10k requests + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_autoscaling_group.workers_launch_template[0] +$87.01 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_launch_template.workers_launch_template[0] + Instance usage (Linux/UNIX, on-demand, m5.large) +$74.46 + EC2 detailed monitoring +$2.10 + block_device_mapping[0] + Storage (general purpose SSD, gp2) +$10.45 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_autoscaling_group.workers_launch_template[1] +$87.01 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_launch_template.workers_launch_template[1] + Instance usage (Linux/UNIX, on-demand, m5.large) +$74.46 + EC2 detailed monitoring +$2.10 + block_device_mapping[0] + Storage (general purpose SSD, gp2) +$10.45 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_autoscaling_group.workers_launch_template[2] $0.00 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_launch_template.workers_launch_template[2] + EC2 detailed monitoring $0.00 + block_device_mapping[0] + Storage (general purpose SSD, gp2) $0.00 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_autoscaling_group.workers_launch_template[3] $0.00 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_launch_template.workers_launch_template[3] + EC2 detailed monitoring $0.00 + block_device_mapping[0] + Storage (general purpose SSD, gp2) $0.00 + module.kubernetes.module.eks.aws_eks_cluster.this[0] +$73.00 + EKS cluster +$73.00 + module.network.module.vpc.aws_eip.nat[0] +$3.65 + IP address (if unused) +$3.65 + module.network.module.vpc.aws_nat_gateway.this[0] +$33.58 + NAT gateway +$33.58 + Data processed Monthly cost depends on usage +$0.046 per GB Monthly cost change for provectus/swiss-army-kube Amount: +$285 ($0.00 → $285) ────────────────────────────────── Key: ~ changed, + added, - removed 60 cloud resources were detected: ∙ 8 were estimated, 5 of which include usage-based costs, see https://infracost.io/usage-file ∙ 52 were free, rerun with --show-skipped to see details ```

This comment will be updated when the cost estimate changes.

_{Is this comment useful? Yes, No}