Closed meteficha closed 9 years ago
prefix/suffix with .
is fairly standard EDSL practise in Haskell, no?
Yep, it is. We could use the Awesome Prelude but I prefer to avoid a dependency on a different Prelude
=).
However, the ^.
is needlessly hard to type, so I'm thinking about changing just this operator (and ?.
) to something easier to type.
Short of using a quasiquoter, I don't think that using different operators would improve the readability much. Closing this issue.
http://blog.felipe.lessa.nom.br/?p=68#comment-125
It's going to be hard to avoid clashing with
==
, but we could at least choose something different for^.
and?.
. Perhaps!
and?!
?