Closed kosloot closed 5 years ago
Good question, we don't really force either way. The current documentation and example have the quote tokens outside the quote element.
I would tend to prefer the LATTER version. That would for instance removing /ignoring quotations more easy.
It would make sense to include the quotation marks inside the quote (and to adapt the documentation with the example).
Ok, since we're about to release the new FoLiA this is probably a good timing for such a change in convention, but still it remains a convention otherwise it breaks backward compatibility.
So probably it is a good idea to have a section in the manual with guidelines about 'conventions' and 'fair use' of FoLiA, as it is not feasible to check for all kinds of abuse. All FoLiA tools should adapt to these conventions, and accept such 'conforming' Documents. They may choose NOT to completely handle documents that are 'valid FoLiA' but not conforming to this rules, although they shouldn't crash or misbehave by mangling the FoLiA. But issuing warnings, ignoring parts or just exit is acceptable.
I think this is settled
Are quotation marks PART of the Quote ??? I wonder what would be correct here:
a "quote" here
Is the (simplified) FoLiA:
Or would THIS be better:
The first version is produced by Ucto at the moment.