Closed mark-hahn closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the shout out!
I think we used to use the same package, and keeping the list of projects updated was really annoying. That's why I decided to create git-projects
. Now I'm not sure I understand this request. You would like to be able to list other projects than the ones containing a .git
? That seems like a good idea, but I think it would be kind of out of scope.
You would like to be able to list other projects than the ones containing a .git?
I admit I don't have many projects that aren't on git. If I know there will never be a remote repo then I only use git for archiving, I think I will have more git-less projects now that I use live-archive for archiving.
I think it would be kind of out of scope.
I have noticed that our use cases are a bit different. The first symptom was wanting multiple root folders. The second was wanting to open always in dev mode. Now I see some new diffs. E.G.the cache isn't needed for a normal number of projects so that's another diff. It will be bloating things a bit and there will be a trade-off of speed when bringing it up versus slowness the rest of the time like load time.
I've given thoughts to a fork..
Cons ....
Pros ...
Of course you would get prominent credit. I can't decide. It;s a toss-up. I will leave the decision totally up to you.
Thanks for the shout out!
Aarrggh. I accidentally had a link to one of my projects instead of yours. I just fixed it.
I have no plans to do a PR in the near future.
I'd like to put virtually anything that smells like a project folder in the list. Right now that means including folders with package.json but I might even come up with better ideas.
I will need to do the other cache feature first or my load time will get ridiculous.
If you haven't noticed, I use
git-projects
all the time. Simple idea but it really works for me. I used to use one that required me to keep an edited list up-to-date but that was a PITA.