prusa3d / Original-Prusa-i3

Original Prusa i3 MK2 3D printer printed parts
http://prusa3d.com
GNU General Public License v2.0
1.59k stars 842 forks source link

Rambo-base in MK2.5 branch is not the most recent version #68

Open subsite opened 6 years ago

subsite commented 6 years ago

The rambo-base.stl in the MK2.5 branch (and in the STL package from the prusa website) is marked "R1", while the downloadable gcodes are "R2". Might it be that the gcodes are made from a local branch of STLs that's not yet pushed upstream?

I'm right now in the process of printing the 2.5 parts, and I don't want to use the gcode as it has all the Rambo parts and I only need this one.

G-code (downloaded from prusa website): screenshot from 2018-04-04 10-07-31

STL (downloaded from prusa website): screenshot from 2018-04-04 10-50-50

Thanks!

prusa3d-bb commented 6 years ago

Hello .

Thank you for your message.

I apologise for my late answer, I was checking why are there two versions and was said that it was our mistake and right now everything should be alright there.

Thank you for letting us know and enjoy the printing!

For any additional help or question please do not hesitate to contact us again, thanks :-) .

S pozdravem / Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen

— Peter Mencák Customer Support

PRUSA Research

+420 222 263 718

+421 220 570 305

188/7a Partyzánská, 17000, Prague

shop.prusa3D.com

For simple troubleshooting, please use: http://help.prusa3d.com

Please rate our reply ...be generous :-)

--- original message --- On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 09:52 am, notifications@github.com Fredrik Welander wrote:

The rambo-base.stl in the MK2.5 branch (and in the STL package from the prusa website) is marked "R1", while the downloadable gcodes are "R2". Might it be that the gcodes are made from a local branch of STLs that's not yet pushed upstream?

I'm right now in the process of printing the 2.5 parts, and I don't want to use the gcode as it has all the Rambo parts an I only need this one.

G-code (downloaded from prusa website):

STL (downloaded from prusa website):

Thanks!

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. --- end of original message ---

subsite commented 6 years ago

Thanks for your reply!

Did you mean the R2 should be there now? I still get R1 STL both from here (https://github.com/prusa3d/Original-Prusa-i3/blob/MK2.5/Printed-Parts/stl/Rambo-base.stl ) and the prusa site (https://www.prusa3d.com/prusa-i3-printable-parts/ ). Is there some other location I'm not aware of?

prusa3d-bb commented 6 years ago

You are very welcome! Anytime :).

You should check our website, if there aren´t updated the STL files yet, please allow us a couple of days to do it. However, the issue has been addressed and meanwhile if the Gcode is alright for you, please use it, thanks.

S pozdravem / Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen

— Peter Mencák Customer Support

PRUSA Research

+420 222 263 718

+421 220 570 305

188/7a Partyzánská, 17000, Prague

shop.prusa3D.com

For simple troubleshooting, please use: http://help.prusa3d.com

Please rate our reply ...be generous :-)

--- original message --- On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 01:15 pm, notifications@github.com Fredrik Welander wrote:

Thanks for your reply!

Did you mean the R2 should be there now? I still get R1 STL both from here (https://github.com/prusa3d/Original-Prusa-i3/blob/MK2.5/Printed-Parts/stl/Rambo-base.stl ) and the prusa site (https://www.prusa3d.com/prusa-i3-printable-parts/ ). Is there some other location I'm not aware of?

You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. --- end of original message ---

subsite commented 6 years ago

Ok, sure I can use the gcode, I'll just waste a bunch of plastic since everything else is already printed and the gcode has all the rambo parts in the same file.

I don't want to be difficult, I just think that if you buy a product where you have to print the parts yourself, you shouldn't have to doubt that the downloadable parts are maintained meticulously.

prusa3d-bb commented 6 years ago

Hi Fredrik.

The parts with the designation R1 are the same as with the R2, so you can use them for sure :).

S pozdravem / Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen

— Peter Mencák Customer Support

PRUSA Research

+420 222 263 718

+421 220 570 305

188/7a Partyzánská, 17000, Prague

shop.prusa3D.com

For simple troubleshooting, please use: http://help.prusa3d.com

Please rate our reply ...be generous :-)

--- original message --- On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 03:48 pm, notifications@github.com Fredrik Welander wrote:

Ok, sure I can use the gcode, I'll just waste a bunch of plastic since everything else is already printed and the gcode has all the rambo parts in the same file.

I don't want to be difficult, I just think that if you buy a product where you have to print the parts yourself, you shouldn't have to doubt that the downloadable parts are maintained meticulously.

You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. --- end of original message ---

subsite commented 6 years ago

The parts with the designation R1 are the same as with the R2, so you can use them for sure :).

That statement is simply not true. For example, in the R2 (gcode) above the screw hole next to the extruder cable slot there is a groove (supposedly to make the screw easier to reach with the hex wrench), and this is missing in the R1 (STL). Now I'm not saying this particular difference is of any consequence, but it shows it's a different revision and you can't be sure it's the only change. (The part shown in the on-line assembly manual says R1 and has the groove, so maybe that's the R1 you say is the same. The shared STL, however, is not.)

I see that you don't think this is an important issue, but I think it should be a matter of principle. If you share printable files in different formats, people should be able to count on that the files are have the same revisions.

I've been very happy with both your products and your customer service so far, and this issue won't change that. I just don't get why this small issue is so difficult to resolve.

prusa3d-bb commented 6 years ago

Hello,

I have addressed this. The parts should be updated on Github soon.

Best regards,

— Jennes De Schutter Technical Support

PRUSA Research +420 222 263 718 +421 220 570 305 188/7a Partyzánská, 17000, Prague shop.prusa3D.com

For simple troubleshooting, please use: http://help.prusa3d.com

Please rate our reply ...be generous :-)

--- original message --- On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:10 am, notifications@github.com Fredrik Welander wrote:

The parts with the designation R1 are the same as with the R2, so you can use them for sure :).

That statement is simply not true. For example, in the R2 (gcode) above the screw hole next to the extruder cable slot there is a groove (supposedly to make the screw easier to reach with the hex wrench), and this is missing in the R1 (STL). Now I'm not saying this particular difference is of any consequence, but it shows it's a different revision and you can't be sure it's the only change. (The part shown in the on-line assembly manual says R1 and has the groove, so maybe that's the R1 you say is the same. The shared STL, however, is not.)

I see that you don't think this is an important issue, but I think it should be a matter of principle. If you share printable files in different formats, people should be able to count on that the files are have the same revisions.

I've been very happy with both your products and your customer service so far, and this issue won't change that. I just don't get why this small issue is so difficult to resolve.

You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. --- end of original message ---

subsite commented 6 years ago

That's good news! I was very close to eating all the MK2.5 gummy bears out of frustration ;)

Cheers

subsite commented 6 years ago

Hello, any news regarding this? The parts don't seem to be updated yet. Thanks!

prusa3d-bb commented 8 days ago

Hello, I have addressed this. The parts should be updated on Github soon.

Best regards, — Jennes De Schutter

clearbucketLabs commented 6 years ago

Hello, any news regarding this? The parts don't seem to be updated yet. Thanks!

I don't think this guy can do it, he just tells someone else who then proceeds to do nothing.

sl1pkn07 commented 4 months ago

Hi

2024 and the rambo base stl is still the old version in the printables page. also here in github https://github.com/prusa3d/Original-Prusa-i3/blob/MK2.5/Printed-Parts/stl/Rambo-base.stl

anyone can fix it? print from gcode is not a option for me

EDIT: the SCAD is also the R1 version https://github.com/prusa3d/Original-Prusa-i3/blob/MK2.5/Printed-Parts/scad/Rambo-base.scad

greetings