prusa3d / Prusa-Firmware

Firmware for Original Prusa i3 3D printer by PrusaResearch
GNU General Public License v3.0
2.01k stars 1.05k forks source link

[BUG] Mesh Bed leveling Test uses hardcoded values #2580

Closed Khazrak closed 10 months ago

Khazrak commented 4 years ago

Printer type - MK3S Printer firmware version- 3.9.0 RC1 (and all earlier

Describe the bug Mesh Bed level Test uses hardcoded values instead of variables like MESH_BED_X. This will let it travel outside of X_MAX_POS. This is only a problem if you have changed the frame or bed (I have Bear Upgrade and Hemera upgrade)

To Reproduce Need a frame that allows sensor to go outside of bed and then run Mesh bed level Test.

Expected behavior The class "mesh_bed_calibration.h", line 9-12 should use variables from Firmware Variants instead. ex: #define BED_Xn (206.f - BED_ZERO_REF_X) //205 Should use "MESH_MAX_X" and some calculations.

ManuGithubSteam commented 4 years ago

Hi

Printer type - MK3S Printer firmware version- 3.9.0 RC1 (and all earlier

Im hit by this as well. I did not do the bear upgrade but i did the steel springs unter the bed. After that i have a hard time with the pinda finding the bed. As the springs have a different height as the normal distancers. I very often get: Sensor did not trigger. Debris on nozzle.... etc. Of course the nozzle is clean but due to the different height of the bed it does not find the bed. So it should use the values it gets from the xyz calibatrion on wich Z coordinate the bed is and not hardcoded ones. Thanks!

JohnE334 commented 4 years ago

Printer type - MK3S Printer firmware version- 3.9.0 RC1

Describe the bug Changing MESH_MAX_X variable doesn't affect mesh bed leveling. My bed is shorter in the x direction than Prusa i3 MK3 bed, but I am unable change this variable. To Reproduce Change MESH_MAX_X variable and watch mesh bed leveling to see if it changes in the x direction.

Expected behavior Changes to "MESH_MAX_X" variable should change the mesh bed leveling in the x direction.

github-actions[bot] commented 10 months ago

This issue has been flagged as stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity. The issue will be closed in 7 days unless someone removes the "stale" label or adds a comment.

github-actions[bot] commented 10 months ago

This issue has been closed due to lack of recent activity.