Closed martinjacobd closed 4 years ago
With respect to the roman: your sources are out of date. For a few days in the latter half of July, there was an error in the source relating to the removal of ss10 and ss20, which I corrected a few days short of two weeks ago. To test I just compiled with
fontmake -o otf -i --optimize-cff 2 -g ../Junicode-width.glyphs
Whew! It takes patience. Generating ttf is much faster, and I recommend it if only because of the capable hinting with ttfautohint.
The italic is another story. I can't build it with either Glyphs or fontmake, and that's because it is simply not ready. As the README says, it is about 43% complete; and then there will be many details to attend to before it's Ready for Prime Time. This is why I've never done a release of JuniusX. As JuniusX/VF is a reworking of Junicode, I suggest that users go on using Junicode (making sure to pick up the latest version in the "legacy" directory of this repo). Unless you don't need an italic, in which case JuniusX is just fine (though with some rough edges).
Check back in a year to a year and a half; with any luck, the italic will be done by then.
My mistake then! Thank you for this!
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 7:27 PM Peter Baker notifications@github.com wrote:
With respect to the roman: your sources are out of date. For a few days in the latter half of July, there was an error in the source relating to the removal of ss10 and ss20, which I corrected a few days short of two weeks ago. To test I just compiled with
fontmake -o otf -i --optimize-cff 2 -g ../Junicode-width.glyphs
Whew! It takes patience. Generating ttf is much faster, and I recommend it if only because of the capable hinting with ttfautohint.
The italic is another story. I can't build it with either Glyphs or fontmake, and that's because it is simply not ready. As the README says, it is about 43% complete; and then there will be many details to attend to before it's Ready for Prime Time. This is why I've never done a release of JuniusX. As JuniusX/VF is a reworking of Junicode, I suggest that users go on using Junicode (making sure to pick up the latest version in the "legacy" directory of this repo). Unless you don't need an italic, in which case JuniusX is just fine (though with some rough edges).
Check back in a year to a year and a half; with any luck, the italic will be done by then.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-New/issues/35#issuecomment-668288924, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGWWRJ6URXVPVOS7Z4S7N3R65BWDANCNFSM4PTW5KFQ .
Hi, I was able to get all widths and weights of the Roman type to compile on Debian GNU/Linux by removing the ss10 and ss20 features, which were complained about. (I am using fontmake version 2.2.0.) But I cannot get the Italic shape to compile. Here is the patch I applied to get the Roman to compile:
The resulting OTFs work quite well and are very handsome!
However, the Italic fails with this error message [complete output of make after Roman has compiled]:
Trying to change the sensitivity of fontmake's renderers did not work, and it is impossible to use the alternate renderer mutatormath because it doesn't support all of the features JuniusX needs.
It would be nice for this to compile on Linux. Alternatively, if we could download precompiled OTFs, that would be great! But it's awkward that we can't use this open source font without resorting to proprietary tools.