Closed Zac-HD closed 1 month ago
and unlike e.g. #286, base64-encoding seems suffiently well-behaved that it would be feasible to have a symbolic implementation instead of realizing. Thoughts?
Yeah, very feasible! (heh, though I've been putting off a similar support for int(s, base=n)
where n != 10)
This is in 0.0.66!
Only supporting base64.b64encode
and base64.b64decode
so far. There's a lot of binascii
left to do, but tracking that in #289
Recent upgrades fixed enough prior problems for https://github.com/HypothesisWorks/hypothesis/pull/4034 to uncover:
and unlike e.g. https://github.com/pschanely/CrossHair/issues/286, base64-encoding seems suffiently well-behaved that it would be feasible to have a symbolic implementation instead of realizing. Thoughts?