Requests memory leak - Githubissues

Munroc commented 6 years ago

Summary.

Expected Result

Program running normally

Actual Result

Program consuming all ram till stops working

Reproduction Steps

Pseudocode:

def function():
    proxies = {
        'https': proxy
    }
    session = requests.Session()
    session.headers.update({'User-Agent': 'user - agent'})
    try:                                           #
        login = session.get(url, proxies=proxies)  # HERE IS WHERE MEMORY LEAKS
    except:                                        #
        return -1                                  #
    return 0

System Information

$ python -m requests.help

{
  "chardet": {
    "version": "3.0.4"
  },
  "cryptography": {
    "version": ""
  },
  "idna": {
    "version": "2.6"
  },
  "implementation": {
    "name": "CPython",
    "version": "3.6.3"
  },
  "platform": {
    "release": "10",
    "system": "Windows"
  },
  "pyOpenSSL": {
    "openssl_version": "",
    "version": null
  },
  "requests": {
    "version": "2.18.4"
  },
  "system_ssl": {
    "version": "100020bf"
  },
  "urllib3": {
    "version": "1.22"
  },
  "using_pyopenssl": false
}

sigmavirus24 commented 6 years ago

Please provide us with the output of

python -m requests.help

If that is unavailable on your version of Requests please provide some basic information about your system (Python version, operating system, etc).

Munroc commented 6 years ago

@sigmavirus24 Done

nateprewitt commented 6 years ago

Hey @munroc, a couple quick questions about your threading implementation since it’s not included in the pseudo code.

Are you creating a new session for every thread and what size is the threadpool you're using?
What tool are you using to determine where the leak is coming from? Would you mind sharing the results?

We’ve had hints of memory leaks around sessions for a while now, but I’m not sure we’ve found a smoking gun or truly confirmed impact.

Munroc commented 6 years ago

@nateprewitt Hello, yes im creating a new session for every thread. The thread pool is 30. I have tryied with 2 - 200 threads and memory leaks anyway. Im not using a tool, i just did this changes to the function: put return 0 before login = session.get and no memory leak. if i put return 0 after login = session.get memory starts leaking. If you want i can send you my source code is not too large.

initbar commented 6 years ago

@Munroc if we have the full code, then I think it would be easier to isolate the actual cause. But based on the code gist that was provided, I think it is very hard to conclude that there is a memory leak.

As you have mentioned, if you return immediately before calling session.get, then only proxies and session objects will exist in the memory (oversimplified.. but I hope you get the idea :smile:). However, once you call session.get(url, proxies=proxies), the HTML of the url will be retrieved and locally saved to the login variable. Which means, each session.get call will "look like" they are leaking memory, but they are actually behaving normally by (memory) linearly increasing by the size of url result.

However, let's say that you were using threads and .join() them immediately afterwards. In that case, I think we need to look at how your threads were managed - and whether they were closed/cleaned properly.

initbar commented 5 years ago

@LeoSZN I think in your specific example, you're closing only the last Process object after generating multiple Process per urls elements.

Could you try daemonizing them using p.daemon = True and run them (so that once the main thread terminates, all the spawned child processes dies also)? Otherwise, store the spawned processes in a separate array and make sure to close all of them using a loop.

leoszn commented 5 years ago

@initbar

Do I need to run p.daemon = True in the loop or outside the loop before p.join() ? By the way do I still need p.join() after applying p.daemon = True ?

Badiboy commented 5 years ago

Ook, I was kicked from the new topic to this one, so let me join yours. May be this issue provide more information and will step up the issue solving...

I'm running Telegram bot and noticed the free memory degradation when running bot for a long time. Firstly, I suspect my code; then I suspect bot and finally I came to requests. :) I used len(gc.get_objects()) to identify that problem exists. I located the communication routines, then cleared all bot code and comes to the example that raises the count of gc objects on every iteration.

Expected Result

len(gc.get_objects()) should give the same result on every loop iteration

Actual Result

The value of len(gc.get_objects()) increases on every loop iteration.

Test N2
GetObjects len: 27959
Test N3
GetObjects len: 27960
Test N4
GetObjects len: 27961
Test N5
GetObjects len: 27962
Test N6
GetObjects len: 27963
Test N7
GetObjects len: 27964

Reproduction Steps

token = "XXX:XXX"
chat_id = '111'
proxy = {'https':'socks5h://ZZZ'} #You may need proxy to run this in Russia

from time import sleep
import gc, requests

def garbage_info():
    res = ""
    res += "\nGetObjects len: " + str(len(gc.get_objects()))
    return res

def tester():
    count = 0
    while(True):
        sleep(1)
        count += 1
        msg = "\nTest N{0}".format(count) + garbage_info()
        print(msg)

        method_url = r'sendMessage'
        payload = {'chat_id': str(chat_id), 'text': msg}

        request_url = "https://api.telegram.org/bot{0}/{1}".format(token, method_url)
        method_name = 'get'

        session = requests.session()
        req = requests.Request(
            method=method_name.upper(),
            url=request_url,
            params=payload
        )
        prep = session.prepare_request(req)

        settings = session.merge_environment_settings(
            prep.url, None, None, None, None)
#            prep.url, proxy, None, None, None)  #Change the line to enable proxy
        send_kwargs = {
            'timeout': None,
            'allow_redirects': None,
        }
        send_kwargs.update(settings)
        resp = session.send(prep, **send_kwargs)

        # For more clean output
        gc.collect()

tester()

System Information

{
  "chardet": {
    "version": "3.0.4"
  },
  "cryptography": {
    "version": "2.3.1"
  },
  "idna": {
    "version": "2.7"
  },
  "implementation": {
    "name": "CPython",
    "version": "3.6.6"
  },
  "platform": {
    "release": "4.15.0-36-generic",
    "system": "Linux"
  },
  "pyOpenSSL": {
    "openssl_version": "1010009f",
    "version": "17.5.0"
  },
  "requests": {
    "version": "2.19.1"
  },
  "system_ssl": {
    "version": "1010007f"
  },
  "urllib3": {
    "version": "1.23"
  },
  "using_pyopenssl": true
}

The same behaviour I had on Python 3.5.3 on Windows10.

initbar commented 5 years ago

@LeoSZN

@initbar

Do I need to run p.daemon = True in the loop or outside the loop before p.join() ? By the way do I still need p.join() after applying p.daemon = True ?

# ..
     for i in urls:
        p = Process(target=main, args=(i,))
        p.daemon = True  # before `.start`
        p.start()
# ..

As a minor note, you can still .join daemon processes -- but they are near-guaranteed to be killed when their parent process terminates (unless they somehow become unintentionally orphaned; in which case, please let me know! I've love to learn more about it).

Otherwise, you can store the Process objects separately as an array and join in the end:

# ..
processes = [ 
  Process(target=main, args=(i,))
  for i in urls
]
# start the process activity.

Badiboy commented 5 years ago

Expected Result

len(gc.get_objects()) should give the same result on every loop iteration

The reason of this behaviour was found in "requests" cache mechanism.

It works incorrect (suspected): it adds a cache record to every call to Telegram API URL (instead of caching it once). But it does not lead to the memory leak, because cache size is limited to 20 and cache is resetting after reaching this limit and the growing number of objects will be decreased back to initial value.

jotunskij commented 5 years ago

Similar issue. Requests eats memory when running in thread. Code to reproduce here:

import gc
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed
import requests
from memory_profiler import profile

def run_thread_request(sess, run):
    response = sess.get('https://www.google.com')
    return

@profile
def main():
    sess = requests.session()
    with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as executor:
        print('Starting!')
        tasks = {executor.submit(run_thread_request, sess, run):
                    run for run in range(50)}
        for _ in as_completed(tasks):
            pass
    print('Done!')
    return

@profile
def calling():
    main()
    gc.collect()
    return

if __name__ == '__main__':
    calling()

In the code given above I pass a session object around, but if I replace it with just running requests.get nothing changes.

Output is:

➜  thread-test pipenv run python run.py
Starting!
Done!
Filename: run.py

Line #    Mem usage    Increment   Line Contents
================================================
    10     23.2 MiB     23.2 MiB   @profile
    11                             def main():
    12     23.2 MiB      0.0 MiB       sess = requests.session()
    13     23.2 MiB      0.0 MiB       with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as executor:
    14     23.2 MiB      0.0 MiB           print('Starting!')
    15     23.4 MiB      0.0 MiB           tasks = {executor.submit(run_thread_request, sess, run):
    16     23.4 MiB      0.0 MiB                       run for run in range(50)}
    17     25.8 MiB      2.4 MiB           for _ in as_completed(tasks):
    18     25.8 MiB      0.0 MiB               pass
    19     25.8 MiB      0.0 MiB       print('Done!')
    20     25.8 MiB      0.0 MiB       return

Filename: run.py

Line #    Mem usage    Increment   Line Contents
================================================
    22     23.2 MiB     23.2 MiB   @profile
    23                             def calling():
    24     25.8 MiB      2.6 MiB       main()
    25     25.8 MiB      0.0 MiB       gc.collect()
    26     25.8 MiB      0.0 MiB       return

And Pipfile looks like this:

[[source]]
url = "https://pypi.python.org/simple"
verify_ssl = true

[requires]
python_version = "3.6"

[packages]
requests = "==2.21.0"
memory-profiler = "==0.55.0"

pawel-lmcb commented 5 years ago

FWIW I am also experiencing a similar memory leak as @jotunskij here is more info

https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/issues/1447

BarryThrill commented 5 years ago

I also do have same issue where using requests.get with threading actually eats up the memory by around 0.1 - 0.9 per requests and it is not "clearing" itself after the requests but saves it.

popjxc commented 5 years ago

Same here, any work around?

tallona commented 4 years ago

Edit My issue looks to be due to using verify=False in requests, I've raised a bug under #5215

Having the same issue. I have a simple script that spawns a thread, this thread calls a function that runs a while loop, this loop queries an API to check a status value and then sleeps for 10 seconds and then the loop will run again until the script is stopped.

When using the requests.get function I can see the memory usage slowly creeping up via task manager by watching the spawned process.

But if I remove the requests.get call from the loop or use urllib3 directly to make the get request, there is very little if any creep of the memory usage.

I've watched this over a two hour period in both cases and when using requests.get the memory usage is at 1GB+ after two hours where as when using urllib3 the memory usage is at approx. 20mb after two hours.

Python 3.7.4 and requests 2.22.0

PedanticHacker commented 4 years ago

It seems Requests is still in beta stage having memory leaks like that. Come on, guys, patch this up! 😉👍

MuhammadAliShahzad commented 4 years ago

Any update on this? Simple POST request with a file upload also creates the similar issue of the memory leak.

far-rainbow commented 4 years ago

Same for me... leakage while on threadpool execution is on Windows python38 too. requests 2.22.0

ghost commented 4 years ago

Same for me

ghost commented 4 years ago

Here is my memory leaking issue, anyone can help ? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59746125/memory-keep-growing-when-using-mutil-thread-download-file

guyskk commented 4 years ago

Call Session.close() and Response.close() can avoid the memory leak. And ssl will consume more memory so the memory leak will more remarkable when request https urls.

First I make 4 test cases:

requests + ssl (https://)
requests + non-ssl (http://)
aiohttp + ssl (https://)
aiohttp + non-ssl (http://)

Pseudo code:

def run(url):
    session = requests.session()
    response = session.get(url)

while True:
    for url in urls:  # about 5k urls of public websites
        # execute in thread pool, size=10
        thread_pool.submit(run, url)

# in another thread, record memory usage every seconds

Memory usage graph(y-axis: MB, x-axis: time), requests use lots of memory and memory increase very fast, while aiohttp memory usage is stable:

Then I add Session.close() and test again:

def run(url):
    session = requests.session()
    response = session.get(url)
    session.close()  # close session !!

Memory usage significant decreased, but memory usage still increase over time:

Finally I add Response.close() and test again:

def run(url):
    session = requests.session()
    response = session.get(url)
    session.close()  # close session !!
    response.close()  # close response !!

Memory usage decreased again, and not increase over time:

Compare aiohttp and requests shows memory leak is not caused by ssl, it's caused by connection resources not closed.

Useful scripts:

class MemoryReporter:
    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
        self.file = open(f'memoryleak/memory_{name}.txt', 'w')
        self.thread = None

    def _get_memory(self):
        return psutil.Process().memory_info().rss

    def main(self):
        while True:
            t = time.time()
            v = self._get_memory()
            self.file.write(f'{t},{v}\n')
            self.file.flush()
            time.sleep(1)

    def start(self):
        self.thread = Thread(target=self.main, name=self.name, daemon=True)
        self.thread.start()

def plot_memory(name):
    filepath = 'memoryleak/memory_{}.txt'.format(name)
    df_mem = pd.read_csv(filepath, index_col=0, names=['t', 'v'])
    df_mem.index = pd.to_datetime(df_mem.index, unit='s')
    df_mem.v = df_mem.v / 1024 / 1024
    df_mem.plot(figsize=(16, 8))

System Information:

$ python -m requests.help
{
  "chardet": {
    "version": "3.0.4"
  },
  "cryptography": {
    "version": ""
  },
  "idna": {
    "version": "2.8"
  },
  "implementation": {
    "name": "CPython",
    "version": "3.7.4"
  },
  "platform": {
    "release": "18.0.0",
    "system": "Darwin"
  },
  "pyOpenSSL": {
    "openssl_version": "",
    "version": null
  },
  "requests": {
    "version": "2.22.0"
  },
  "system_ssl": {
    "version": "1010104f"
  },
  "urllib3": {
    "version": "1.25.6"
  },
  "using_pyopenssl": false
}

VeNoMouS commented 4 years ago

SSL leak problem is packaged OpenSSL <= 3.7.4 on Windows and OSX, its not releasing the memory from the context properly

https://github.com/VeNoMouS/cloudscraper/issues/143#issuecomment-613092377

andre487 commented 1 year ago

I have the same problem. It appears only when I use proxies argument.

{'chardet': {'version': None},
 'charset_normalizer': {'version': '3.0.1'},
 'cryptography': {'version': ''},
 'idna': {'version': '3.4'},
 'implementation': {'name': 'CPython', 'version': '3.10.9'},
 'platform': {'release': '5.4.161-26.3', 'system': 'Linux'},
 'pyOpenSSL': {'openssl_version': '', 'version': None},
 'requests': {'version': '2.28.1'},
 'system_ssl': {'version': '1010113f'},
 'urllib3': {'version': '1.26.13'},
 'using_charset_normalizer': True,
 'using_pyopenssl': False}

constantind commented 1 year ago

Same happens with requests 2.27.1 and urllib3 1.26.13 if it helps tracemalloc shows increments: stats top 10 every 500: requests/utils.py:353: size=4600 B, count=60, average=77 B diffs top 10 every 500: urllib3/_collections.py:153: size=1344 B (+168 B), count=6 (+1), average=224 B requests/utils.py:822: size=840 B (+168 B), count=5 (+1), average=168 B

teodoryantcheff commented 11 months ago

Ok, so this is, by the looks of it still an issue. Using requests.Session() to make requests to an https url leads to constantly increasing memory usage and ultimately an OOM condition and a crash. The requests are being made using proxies to some proxy

Here's a shot of the monotonously increasing mem usage :

This is from a production system running (in a docker container):

root@docker-host-01:~/uship-price-optimizer# docker exec -it uship-price-optimizer python -m requests.help
{
  "chardet": {
    "version": null
  },
  "charset_normalizer": {
    "version": "3.2.0"
  },
  "cryptography": {
    "version": ""
  },
  "idna": {
    "version": "3.4"
  },
  "implementation": {
    "name": "CPython",
    "version": "3.11.5"
  },
  "platform": {
    "release": "5.19.0-46-generic",
    "system": "Linux"
  },
  "pyOpenSSL": {
    "openssl_version": "",
    "version": null
  },
  "requests": {
    "version": "2.31.0"
  },
  "system_ssl": {
    "version": "30000090"
  },
  "urllib3": {
    "version": "2.0.5"
  },
  "using_charset_normalizer": true,
  "using_pyopenssl": false
}

But we see the same behavior on Windows:

(venv) PS E:\src\uship-price-optimizer\src> python -m requests.help
{
  "chardet": {
    "version": null
  },
  "charset_normalizer": {
    "version": "3.2.0"
  },
  "cryptography": {
    "version": ""
  },
  "idna": {
    "version": "3.4"
  },
  "implementation": {
    "name": "CPython",
    "version": "3.11.5"
  },
  "platform": {
    "release": "10",
    "system": "Windows"
  },
  "pyOpenSSL": {
    "openssl_version": "",
    "version": null
  },
  "requests": {
    "version": "2.31.0"
  },
  "system_ssl": {
    "version": "30000090"
  },
  "urllib3": {
    "version": "1.26.16"
  },
  "using_charset_normalizer": true,
  "using_pyopenssl": false
}
(venv) PS E:\src\uship-price-optimizer\src>

AND in WSL2:

(venv_linux) teo@jailbreaker-pc:/mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/src$ python -m requests.help
{
  "chardet": {
    "version": null
  },
  "charset_normalizer": {
    "version": "3.2.0"
  },
  "cryptography": {
    "version": ""
  },
  "idna": {
    "version": "3.4"
  },
  "implementation": {
    "name": "CPython",
    "version": "3.11.5"
  },
  "platform": {
    "release": "5.15.90.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2",
    "system": "Linux"
  },
  "pyOpenSSL": {
    "openssl_version": "",
    "version": null
  },
  "requests": {
    "version": "2.31.0"
  },
  "system_ssl": {
    "version": "1010106f"
  },
  "urllib3": {
    "version": "2.0.5"
  },
  "using_charset_normalizer": true,
  "using_pyopenssl": false
}

I'm observing a memory increase every time a requests.Session() is instantiated, never to be reclaimed. A Session that is actually wrapped in a CloudScraper but there's nothing special done to how the requests and sessions are handled there. And due to using cloudscraper, I can't test the code using only requests.get() as opposed to using requests.Session(), btw.

Higher up in this thread there's this comment by @VeNoMouS , but since the issues tracker of his repo was disabled, I can't see what he said there, and neither google nor archive.org has a copy of the comment. But whatever it says, I can see the memory leaking every time a new session is created and later discarded.

While investigating what's going on I stumbled on this original Python issue, migrated to GitHub here, and seems to imply that this is a Windows only problem but that does not seem to be the case. Both are closed as resolved, btw.

Then I went on to memray the thing. Here's the summary view:

(venv_linux) teo@jailbreaker-pc:/mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/src$ python3.11 -m memray tree  memray-main.py.pydantic_2.bin

Allocation metadata
-------------------
Command line arguments: '/mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/venv_linux/bin/memray run main.py'
Peak memory size: 132.543MB
Number of allocations: 43997698

Biggest 10 allocations:
-----------------------
📂 53.567MB (100.00 %) <ROOT>
├── [[8 frames hidden in 4 file(s)]]
│   └── 📂 40.721MB (76.02 %) retry  /mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/venv_linux/lib/python3.11/site-packages/backoff/_sync.py:105
│       ├── [[11 frames hidden in 6 file(s)]]
│       │   └── 📄 32.564MB (60.79 %) ssl_wrap_socket  /mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/venv_linux/lib/python3.11/site-packages/urllib3/util/ssl_.py:444
│       └── [[8 frames hidden in 5 file(s)]]
│           └── 📄 7.006MB (13.08 %) raw_decode  /usr/lib/python3.11/json/decoder.py:353
└── [[3 frames hidden in 2 file(s)]]
    └── 📂 12.846MB (23.98 %) _run_code  <frozen runpy>:88
        ├── [[33 frames hidden in 7 file(s)]]
        │   └── 📂 5.503MB (10.27 %) _call_with_frames_removed  <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:241
        │       ├── [[16 frames hidden in 7 file(s)]]
        │       │   └── 📄 4.012MB (7.49 %) validate_core_schema  /mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/venv_linux/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_core_utils.py:586
        │       └── [[3 frames hidden in 2 file(s)]]
        │           └── 📄 1.491MB (2.78 %) create_schema_validator  /mnt/e/src/uship-price-optimizer/venv_linux/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/plugin/_schema_validator.py:34
        ├── [[8 frames hidden in 5 file(s)]]
        │   └── 📄 3.000MB (5.60 %) __next__  /usr/lib/python3.11/csv.py:119
        ├── [[12 frames hidden in 4 file(s)]]
        │   └── 📄 1.846MB (3.45 %) _compile_bytecode  <frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>:729
        └── [[5 frames hidden in 3 file(s)]]
            └── 📂 2.496MB (4.66 %) _call_with_frames_removed  <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:241
                ├── [[30 frames hidden in 7 file(s)]]
                │   └── 📄 1.319MB (2.46 %) _compile_bytecode  <frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>:729
                └── [[22 frames hidden in 5 file(s)]]
                    └── 📄 1.177MB (2.20 %) _compile_bytecode  <frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>:729

and the memory stack with util/ssl_.py

Looking around at the solutions to memory leaks in various systems mentioning and linked to this issue, I changed our code to "force close" the sessions using:

    with cloudscraper.create_scraper(...) as session:
        session.proxies = proxyconfig.get_proxy()
        .
        .
        .

cloudscraper.create_scraper instantiates a requests.Session() essentially.

for making the requests I changed it to

        with session.get(url='.......',
                         # allow_redirects=True,
                         params={...<params>...},
                         timeout=5, ) as response:
        .
        .
        .

This seems to have improved the situation a bit, as at least now it's not monotonously growing but also has some [slight] reductions

But this is still not what I think it should be looking like.

Currently, we are keeping it under control by setting a memory limit on the container it's running on in productions and we are also passing

...--max-requests 750 --max-requests-jitter 50... to gunicorn

So, what would you suggest the next logical step to be?

Thanks!

psf / requests

Requests memory leak #4601

Expected Result

Actual Result

Reproduction Steps

System Information

Expected Result

Actual Result

Reproduction Steps

System Information

Expected Result