Open hanase opened 5 years ago
We now have a child class that overwrites the _min_max_fars function. Step 2. above is replaced by taking the sum of max_far_from_dua
and max_far
capped by the max_far_from_heights
. In Step 3., max_far_from_heights
is only considered if max_far
is not given.
@jensenmj Mike, given Beccah's notes on the FLU columns, how do you think this should be changed?
The UDST feasibility model determines the max FAR for mix-use parcels using the zoning_heights table as follows:
max_far_from_heights
).max_dua
, it calculates the corresponding FAR (max_far_from_dua
) and takes the minimum ofmax_far
,max_far_from_heights
, andmax_far_from_dua
.max_far
andmax_far_from_heights
.The last two steps are implemented in the _min_max_fars function.
Our interpretation of the table is that
max_far
limits the non-residential part whereasmax_dua
limits the residential part of the mixed development. Thus, taking the minimum over these is wrong.