psychoinformatics-de / remodnav

Robust Eye Movement Detection for Natural Viewing
Other
61 stars 16 forks source link

Abnormal saccade and pursuit detection #43

Closed ruw001 closed 2 years ago

ruw001 commented 2 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for developing this great tool. It saved me a ton of time. I used a tobii 120hz eye tracker, and conducted a series of reading tasks where we track people's eyes when they read static passage. Most of the eye-movement events look reasonable, but for some participants, there are many pursuits which I think are falsely classified. I looked at the data, it seems some small saccades are not detected in the first phase (see below), so they are included inside fixation/pursuit. Is there any way to work around that? The only parameter I changed is savgol-length. I change it to 0.025 so it fits my sampling rate.

Screen Shot 2022-08-31 at 11 56 51 AM

Another miss classification is the saccade onset (below). It looks like the adjacent small saccades are not detected successfully, thus the major saccade duration is very long. What should i do?

Screen Shot 2022-08-31 at 12 00 18 PM

Thanks, Ru

adswa commented 2 years ago

I don't have experience with reading data myself. I guess the saccades are smaller than during free viewing paradigms? I wonder if the parameters --min-saccade_duration and --min-pursuit_duration could be of help to allow shorter saccades and disallow short pursuits, and whether the default value of 2Hz for --max-initial-saccade-freq holds for reading tasks

ruw001 commented 2 years ago

Hi Adina,

Thanks for your reply. I tweaked different parameters regarding saccade detection, and found that the saccade detection looks great when I set max_initial_saccade_freq to 4, with other parameters unchanged.

For some participants with low calibration accuracy, their data might be noisier, so super long saccade duration still happens. I can work around by further setting noise_factor to 10.

adswa commented 2 years ago

I'm glad you found a working solution. I hope I read correctly that I can close this issue? Please feel free to reopen if something is yet unaddressed.